Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RMGSX
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RMGSX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.70
Change+$0.12 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.38B
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat S
Price$12.05
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets589.61M
CIMAX vs RMGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RMGSX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and RMGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. RMGSX (590M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RMGSX: CIMAX (3.63) vs RMGSX (2.74). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RMGSX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RMGSX (9 years). RMGSX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). RMGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). RMGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RMGSX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RMGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.43 vs. CIMAX (13.89). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.68 vs. RMGSX (26.01).
| CIMAX | RMGSX | CIMAX / RMGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.89 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.07 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.574 | 1.688 | 153% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 590M | 23,559% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.63 | 2.74 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.89 | 18.43 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.71 | 40.65 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.68 | 26.01 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement