Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAZCX
CIMAX vs RAZCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAZCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.36
Change+$0.15 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.4B
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat C
Price$11.58
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets583.32M
CIMAX vs RAZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAZCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and RAZCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. RAZCX (583M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAZCX: CIMAX (3.58) vs RAZCX (2.49). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAZCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RAZCX (8 years). RAZCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). RAZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. CIMAX (92.00). RAZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAZCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.96 vs. RAZCX (8.68). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.41 vs. RAZCX (29.75).
| CIMAX | RAZCX | CIMAX / RAZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.89 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 2.07 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.536 | 13.300 | 109% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 583M | 23,671% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.58 | 2.49 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | 8.68 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.53 | 50.88 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.41 | 29.75 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement