Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAZCX
CIMAX vs RAZCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAZCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.44
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.61B
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat C
Price$11.64
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets586.03M
CIMAX vs RAZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAZCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RAZCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. RAZCX (586M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAZCX: CIMAX (3.55) vs RAZCX (2.43). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAZCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RAZCX (8 years). RAZCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). RAZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAZCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RAZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.79 vs. CIMAX (9.18). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.48 vs. RAZCX (28.66).
| CIMAX | RAZCX | CIMAX / RAZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.89 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 2.07 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.871 | 14.225 | 105% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 586M | 23,720% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 2.43 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.18 | 10.79 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.11 | 49.73 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.48 | 28.66 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement