Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAZCX
CIMAX vs RAZCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAZCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.26
Change+$0.15 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.38B
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat C
Price$11.89
Change+$0.24 (+2.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets593.34M
CIMAX vs RAZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAZCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and RAZCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. RAZCX (593M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAZCX: CIMAX (3.51) vs RAZCX (1.84). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAZCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RAZCX (8 years). RAZCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). RAZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). RAZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAZCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RAZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.49 vs. CIMAX (12.41). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.49 vs. RAZCX (21.84).
| CIMAX | RAZCX | CIMAX / RAZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.89 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 2.07 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.149 | 2.677 | 155% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 593M | 23,440% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 1.84 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.41 | 15.49 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.02 | 35.75 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.49 | 21.84 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers