Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAZCX
CIMAX vs RAZCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAZCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.14
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.53B
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat C
Price$11.62
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets584.47M
CIMAX vs RAZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAZCX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and RAZCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. RAZCX (584M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAZCX: CIMAX (3.49) vs RAZCX (2.53). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAZCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RAZCX (8 years). RAZCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). RAZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). RAZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAZCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RAZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.83 vs. CIMAX (8.76). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.14 vs. RAZCX (20.98).
| CIMAX | RAZCX | CIMAX / RAZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.89 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 2.07 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.429 | 14.029 | 67% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 584M | 23,973% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 2.53 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.76 | 12.83 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.27 | 39.41 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.14 | 20.98 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement