Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAPCX
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAPCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.11
Change-$0.26 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.38B
Cohen & Steers Real Assets C
Price$11.71
Change+$0.53 (+4.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAPCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and RAPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. RAPCX (1.52B). RAPCX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: RAPCX (5.13) vs CIMAX (3.51). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAPCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RAPCX (14 years). RAPCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). RAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). RAPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAPCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RAPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.95 vs. CIMAX (12.41). RAPCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.32 vs. CIMAX (34.49).
| CIMAX | RAPCX | CIMAX / RAPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.81 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.93 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.149 | 6.551 | 63% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 1.52B | 9,133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 5.13 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.41 | 20.95 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.02 | 28.52 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.49 | 49.32 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.29 | 92.11 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement