Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAPCX
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAPCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.72
Change-$0.15 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.73B
Cohen & Steers Real Assets C
Price$10.75
Change-$0.07 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAPCX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RAPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. RAPCX (1.29B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAPCX: CIMAX (3.66) vs RAPCX (1.59). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAPCX: CIMAX (23 years) vs RAPCX (14 years). RAPCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). RAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. CIMAX (92.00). RAPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAPCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.57 vs. RAPCX (11.03). RAPCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.91 vs. CIMAX (46.51).
| CIMAX | RAPCX | CIMAX / RAPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.81 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.93 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.797 | 9.791 | 120% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 1.29B | 10,510% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 1.59 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.57 | 11.03 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.60 | 13.50 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.51 | 51.91 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.59 | 51.17 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement