Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAPCX
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAPCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.56
Change-$0.21 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets140.2B
Cohen & Steers Real Assets C
Price$11.36
Change-$0.08 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAPCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RAPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. RAPCX (1.48B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAPCX: CIMAX (3.57) vs RAPCX (1.53). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAPCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RAPCX (14 years). RAPCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). RAPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAPCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RAPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.39 vs. CIMAX (11.65). RAPCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.64 vs. CIMAX (43.31).
| CIMAX | RAPCX | CIMAX / RAPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.81 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.93 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.252 | 16.082 | 101% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 1.48B | 9,453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 1.53 | 234% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.65 | 13.39 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.06 | 20.84 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.31 | 49.64 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.90 | 72.44 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement