Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAPCX
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAPCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.14
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.53B
Cohen & Steers Real Assets C
Price$11.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.53B
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAPCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and RAPCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. RAPCX (1.53B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAPCX: CIMAX (3.49) vs RAPCX (1.48). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAPCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RAPCX (14 years). RAPCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). RAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). RAPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAPCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RAPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.23 vs. CIMAX (8.76). RAPCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.12 vs. CIMAX (31.14).
| CIMAX | RAPCX | CIMAX / RAPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.81 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.93 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.429 | 12.226 | 77% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 1.53B | 9,132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 1.48 | 235% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.76 | 12.23 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.27 | 19.20 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.14 | 40.12 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.76 | 68.12 | 111% |