Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAPCX
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAPCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.20
Change-$0.14 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.63B
Cohen & Steers Real Assets C
Price$10.88
Change+$0.05 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAPCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RAPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. RAPCX (1.19B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAPCX: CIMAX (3.73) vs RAPCX (1.40). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAPCX: CIMAX (23 years) vs RAPCX (13 years). RAPCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). RAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. CIMAX (92.00). RAPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAPCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.65 vs. RAPCX (10.74). RAPCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.10 vs. CIMAX (48.27).
| CIMAX | RAPCX | CIMAX / RAPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.81 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.93 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.010 | 9.347 | 96% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 1.19B | 11,167% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.73 | 1.40 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.65 | 10.74 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.42 | 10.81 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.27 | 55.10 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.18 | 42.50 | 160% |