Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAPCX
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAPCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.80
Change+$0.09 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.54B
Cohen & Steers Real Assets C
Price$10.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAPCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RAPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. RAPCX (1.19B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAPCX: CIMAX (3.66) vs RAPCX (1.59). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAPCX: CIMAX (23 years) vs RAPCX (13 years). RAPCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). RAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. CIMAX (92.00). RAPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAPCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.20 vs. RAPCX (10.60). RAPCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.08 vs. CIMAX (50.07).
| CIMAX | RAPCX | CIMAX / RAPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.81 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.93 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.506 | 9.588 | 120% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 1.19B | 11,419% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 1.59 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.20 | 10.60 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.82 | 14.42 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.07 | 54.08 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.80 | 46.86 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement