Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAPCX
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAPCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.21
Change+$0.07 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.15B
Cohen & Steers Real Assets C
Price$10.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAPCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RAPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. RAPCX (1.3B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAPCX: CIMAX (3.58) vs RAPCX (1.56). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAPCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RAPCX (14 years). RAPCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). RAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. CIMAX (92.00). RAPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAPCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. RAPCX (8.25). RAPCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.76 vs. CIMAX (44.76).
| CIMAX | RAPCX | CIMAX / RAPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.81 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.93 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.212 | 10.704 | 123% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 1.3B | 10,538% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.58 | 1.56 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 8.25 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.76 | 15.47 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.76 | 47.76 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.27 | 61.08 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement