Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs LGMNX
CIMAX vs LGMNX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs LGMNX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.36
Change+$0.15 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.67B
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation N
Price$26.81
Change+$0.08 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.89B
CIMAX vs LGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. LGMNX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and LGMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. LGMNX (2.89B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than LGMNX: CIMAX (3.58) vs LGMNX (1.31). CIMAX was incepted earlier than LGMNX: CIMAX (24 years) vs LGMNX (9 years). LGMNX (0.82) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. LGMNX (22.00). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMNX: CIMAX (250) vs LGMNX (1000000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.96 vs. LGMNX (0.48). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.41 vs. LGMNX (4.97).
| CIMAX | LGMNX | CIMAX / LGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.82 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.82 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.536 | 9.206 | 158% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 2.89B | 4,783% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.58 | 1.31 | 273% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | 0.48 | 2,063% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.53 | 34.84 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.41 | 4.97 | 994% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement