Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FQTEX
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FQTEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.80
Change+$0.09 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.54B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.36
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.01M
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FQTEX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FQTEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FQTEX (384M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: FQTEX (6.04) vs CIMAX (3.66). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMAX (23 years) vs FQTEX (6 years). CIMAX (0.61) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and CIMAX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMAX (250). FQTEX (15.31) and CIMAX (15.20) have marching annual gain over last year. FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 78.40 vs. CIMAX (50.07).
| CIMAX | FQTEX | CIMAX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.11 | 555% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.506 | 11.248 | 102% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 384M | 35,417% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 6.04 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.20 | 15.31 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.82 | 43.96 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.07 | 78.40 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement