Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FQTEX
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FQTEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.87
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.73B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.45
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets399.29M
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FQTEX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FQTEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FQTEX (399M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: FQTEX (6.04) vs CIMAX (3.66). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMAX (23 years) vs FQTEX (6 years). CIMAX (0.61) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and CIMAX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMAX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.51 vs. CIMAX (13.57). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 75.59 vs. CIMAX (46.51).
| CIMAX | FQTEX | CIMAX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.11 | 555% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.797 | 11.997 | 98% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 399M | 34,085% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 6.04 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.57 | 14.51 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.60 | 42.03 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.51 | 75.59 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers