Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FQTEX
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FQTEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.16
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.53B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$14.19
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets488.66M
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FQTEX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and FQTEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FQTEX (489M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: FQTEX (6.13) vs CIMAX (3.49). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMAX (24 years) vs FQTEX (7 years). CIMAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.40 vs. CIMAX (65.00). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMAX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.97 vs. CIMAX (8.76). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 71.10 vs. CIMAX (31.14).
| CIMAX | FQTEX | CIMAX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.11 | 536% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.429 | 21.002 | 45% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 489M | 28,630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 6.13 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.76 | 19.97 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.27 | 50.68 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.14 | 71.10 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers