Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FQTEX
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FQTEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.21
Change+$0.07 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.15B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.43
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets414.22M
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FQTEX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FQTEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FQTEX (414M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: FQTEX (5.93) vs CIMAX (3.58). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMAX (24 years) vs FQTEX (6 years). CIMAX (0.61) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and CIMAX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMAX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.88 vs. CIMAX (11.47). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 74.18 vs. CIMAX (44.76).
| CIMAX | FQTEX | CIMAX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.11 | 555% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.212 | 12.944 | 102% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 414M | 33,092% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.58 | 5.93 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.47 | 13.88 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.76 | 43.83 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.76 | 74.18 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers