Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FQTEX
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FQTEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.56
Change-$0.21 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets140.2B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets454.11M
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FQTEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FQTEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FQTEX (454M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: FQTEX (6.39) vs CIMAX (3.57). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMAX (24 years) vs FQTEX (6 years). CIMAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMAX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.22 vs. CIMAX (11.65). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 66.69 vs. CIMAX (43.31).
| CIMAX | FQTEX | CIMAX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.11 | 536% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.252 | 16.653 | 98% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 454M | 30,837% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 6.39 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.65 | 14.22 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.06 | 41.79 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.31 | 66.69 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement