Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FQTEX
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FQTEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.11
Change-$0.26 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.38B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$14.44
Change+$0.76 (+5.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets513.58M
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FQTEX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and FQTEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FQTEX (514M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: FQTEX (6.38) vs CIMAX (3.51). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMAX (24 years) vs FQTEX (7 years). CIMAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.08). FQTEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.40 vs. CIMAX (65.00). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMAX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.18 vs. CIMAX (12.41). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 69.74 vs. CIMAX (34.49).
| CIMAX | FQTEX | CIMAX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.08 | 737% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.149 | 3.700 | 112% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 514M | 27,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 6.38 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.41 | 22.18 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.02 | 45.67 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.49 | 69.74 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers