Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FGGBX
CIMAX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FGGBX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.16
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.53B
Templeton Global Dynamic Income R6
Price$2.93
Change-$0.01 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets317.61M
CIMAX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FGGBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and FGGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FGGBX (318M). FGGBX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: FGGBX (4.20) vs CIMAX (3.49). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIMAX (24 years) vs FGGBX (13 years). FGGBX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIMAX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.73 vs. CIMAX (8.66). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.24 vs. FGGBX (25.86).
| CIMAX | FGGBX | CIMAX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.89 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.96 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.513 | 27.262 | 35% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 318M | 44,025% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 4.20 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.66 | 26.73 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.25 | 47.01 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.24 | 25.86 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.03 | 39.24 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers