Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FFAAX
CIMAX vs FFAAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FFAAX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.36
Change+$0.15 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.67B
Franklin Global Allocation Adv
Price$17.41
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.83B
CIMAX vs FFAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FFAAX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and FFAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. FFAAX (2.83B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than FFAAX: CIMAX (3.58) vs FFAAX (0.84). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FFAAX: CIMAX (24 years) vs FFAAX (22 years). FFAAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FFAAX (59.82). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAAX: CIMAX (250) vs FFAAX (100000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.96 vs. FFAAX (9.12). FFAAX return over 5 years is better than : 58.64 vs. CIMAX (49.41).
| CIMAX | FFAAX | CIMAX / FFAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.74 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.77 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.536 | 10.829 | 134% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 2.83B | 4,873% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.58 | 0.84 | 428% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | 9.12 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.53 | 50.21 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.41 | 58.64 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.82 | 70.37 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers