CILJF
Price
$3.65
Change
+$0.19 (+5.49%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
158.03B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PNGAY
Price
$15.46
Change
-$0.04 (-0.26%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
149.64B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CILJF vs PNGAY

Header iconCILJF vs PNGAY Comparison
Open Charts CILJF vs PNGAYBanner chart's image
China Life Insurance
Price$3.65
Change+$0.19 (+5.49%)
Volume$6.05K
Capitalization158.03B
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China
Price$15.46
Change-$0.04 (-0.26%)
Volume$64.62K
Capitalization149.64B
CILJF vs PNGAY Comparison Chart in %
CILJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PNGAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CILJF vs. PNGAY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILJF is a Buy and PNGAY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CILJF: $3.65 vs. PNGAY: $15.46)
Brand notoriety: CILJF and PNGAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CILJF: 60% vs. PNGAY: 38%
Market capitalization -- CILJF: $158.03B vs. PNGAY: $149.64B
CILJF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $158.03B. PNGAY’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $149.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $158.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $27.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CILJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNGAY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CILJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNGAY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNGAY is a better buy in the long-term than CILJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CILJF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNGAY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CILJF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PNGAY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CILJF is a better buy in the short-term than PNGAY.

Price Growth

CILJF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +9.74% price change this week, while PNGAY (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +4.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.09% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CILJF($158B) has a higher market cap than PNGAY($150B). PNGAY has higher P/E ratio than CILJF: PNGAY (7.19) vs CILJF (4.31). CILJF YTD gains are higher at: 93.122 vs. PNGAY (40.672). PNGAY has higher revenues than CILJF: PNGAY (738B) vs CILJF (517B).
CILJFPNGAYCILJF / PNGAY
Capitalization158B150B105%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD93.12240.672229%
P/E Ratio4.317.1960%
Revenue517B738B70%
Total Cash121BN/A-
Total Debt37BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CILJF vs PNGAY: Fundamental Ratings
CILJF
PNGAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2629
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51100
SMR RATING
1..100
1001
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3842
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5232
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNGAY's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as CILJF (29). This means that PNGAY’s stock grew similarly to CILJF’s over the last 12 months.

CILJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNGAY (100). This means that CILJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNGAY’s over the last 12 months.

PNGAY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CILJF (100). This means that PNGAY’s stock grew significantly faster than CILJF’s over the last 12 months.

CILJF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as PNGAY (42). This means that CILJF’s stock grew similarly to PNGAY’s over the last 12 months.

PNGAY's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as CILJF (52). This means that PNGAY’s stock grew similarly to CILJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CILJFPNGAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CILJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PNGAY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWSA26.82-0.01
-0.04%
News Corp
CCAP14.23-0.01
-0.07%
Crescent Capital BDC
DK40.85-0.85
-2.04%
Delek US Holdings
ZNTL1.34-0.06
-4.29%
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals
JDZG1.83-0.11
-5.67%
Jiade Limited

CILJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CILJF has been loosely correlated with PNGAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CILJF jumps, then PNGAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CILJF
1D Price
Change %
CILJF100%
+5.49%
PNGAY - CILJF
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
AAGIY - CILJF
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
PUK - CILJF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
AAIGF - CILJF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
PIAIF - CILJF
23%
Poorly correlated
+9.86%
More

PNGAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNGAY has been closely correlated with AAGIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNGAY jumps, then AAGIY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNGAY
1D Price
Change %
PNGAY100%
+1.24%
AAGIY - PNGAY
73%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
PUK - PNGAY
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
CILJF - PNGAY
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
AAIGF - PNGAY
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
PIAIF - PNGAY
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More