Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CILGX vs RMFEX
CILGX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMFEX
Clarkston Institutional
Price$16.08
Change+$0.15 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.68M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.89
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
CILGX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. CILGX (176M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMFEX (1.46) vs CILGX (0.85). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CILGX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). CILGX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CILGX (23.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMFEX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. CILGX (2.24). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.52 vs. CILGX (30.77).
| CILGX | RMFEX | CILGX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.62 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.62 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.010 | 13.941 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 176M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.46 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.24 | 5.28 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.68 | 40.09 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.77 | 59.52 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement