Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CILGX vs RMFCX
CILGX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMFCX
Clarkston Institutional
Price$16.30
Change+$0.07 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.76M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
CILGX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CILGX (163M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMFCX (1.18) vs CILGX (0.82). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CILGX (10 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CILGX (0.79). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CILGX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMFCX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. CILGX (4.57). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.19 vs. CILGX (22.19).
| CILGX | RMFCX | CILGX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.91 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.981 | 9.715 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.18 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 7.94 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.99 | 28.72 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.19 | 46.19 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers