Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CILGX vs RMEBX
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMEBX
Clarkston Institutional
Price$16.35
Change-$0.04 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.59M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CILGX (173M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMEBX (1.05) vs CILGX (0.84). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CILGX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CILGX (0.79). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CILGX (23.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMEBX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. CILGX (4.61). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.80 vs. CILGX (26.16).
| CILGX | RMEBX | CILGX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.07 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.016 | 14.940 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.05 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.61 | 6.55 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.50 | 30.03 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.16 | 53.80 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers