Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIL vs IEFA
CIL vs IEFA Comparison
Open Charts CIL vs IEFA
VictoryShares International Vol Wtd ETF
Price$52.70
Change-$0.48 (-0.90%)
Volume$1.38K
Net Assets71.89M
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$88.91
Change-$0.97 (-1.08%)
Volume$14M
Net Assets159.99B
CIL vs IEFA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIL vs. IEFA commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIL is a StrongBuy and IEFA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 160B vs. CIL (71.9M). CIL (30.423) and IEFA (30.188) have matching annual dividend yield . CIL was incepted earlier than IEFA: CIL (10 years) vs IEFA (13 years). IEFA (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than CIL (0.45). CIL has a higher turnover IEFA (2.00) vs IEFA (2.00).
| CIL | IEFA | CIL / IEFA | |
| Gain YTD | 30.423 | 30.188 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 71.9M | 160B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.07 | 643% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 2.00 | 1,500% |
| Yield | 2.90 | 2.95 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIL | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 23 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CIL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIL has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIL jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
IEFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.06% | ||
More | ||||