Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIL vs IEFA
CIL vs IEFA Comparison
Open Charts CIL vs IEFA
VictoryShares International Vol Wtd ETF
Price$51.08
Change-$0.53 (-1.03%)
Volume$100
Net Assets92.47M
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$86.53
Change+$0.62 (+0.72%)
Volume$11.29M
Net Assets153.79B
CIL vs IEFA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIL vs. IEFA commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIL is a Hold and IEFA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 154B vs. CIL (92.5M). IEFA (25.335) and CIL (25.005) have matching annual dividend yield . CIL was incepted earlier than IEFA: CIL (10 years) vs IEFA (13 years). IEFA (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than CIL (0.45). CIL has a higher turnover IEFA (2.00) vs IEFA (2.00).
| CIL | IEFA | CIL / IEFA | |
| Gain YTD | 25.005 | 25.335 | 99% |
| Net Assets | 92.5M | 154B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.07 | 643% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 2.00 | 1,500% |
| Yield | 2.45 | 3.04 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIL | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 75% | 19 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIL has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIL jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
IEFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | 100% | +0.72% | ||
| ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
More | ||||