CIIHY
Price
$30.10
Change
-$0.16 (-0.53%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
46.09B
DMGGF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
55.03M
57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIIHY vs DMGGF

Header iconCIIHY vs DMGGF Comparison
Open Charts CIIHY vs DMGGFBanner chart's image
Citic Securities
Price$30.10
Change-$0.16 (-0.53%)
Volume$175
Capitalization46.09B
DMG Blockchain Solutions
Price$0.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$429.65K
Capitalization55.03M
CIIHY vs DMGGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIIHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIIHY vs. DMGGF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIIHY is a Buy and DMGGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CIIHY: $30.10 vs. DMGGF: $0.21)
Brand notoriety: CIIHY and DMGGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIIHY: 6% vs. DMGGF: 299%
Market capitalization -- CIIHY: $46.09B vs. DMGGF: $55.03M
CIIHY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $46.09B. DMGGF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $55.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIIHY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDMGGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CIIHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DMGGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIIHY is a better buy in the long-term than DMGGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIIHY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DMGGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIIHY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DMGGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIIHY is a better buy in the short-term than DMGGF.

Price Growth

CIIHY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +8.90% price change this week, while DMGGF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +27.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +6.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +114.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

DMGGF is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+6.16% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIIHY($46.1B) has a higher market cap than DMGGF($55M). CIIHY YTD gains are higher at: 11.693 vs. DMGGF (-12.807). CIIHY has higher revenues than DMGGF: CIIHY (64.5B) vs DMGGF (31.9M).
CIIHYDMGGFCIIHY / DMGGF
Capitalization46.1B55M83,818%
EBITDAN/A-7.99M-
Gain YTD11.693-12.807-91%
P/E Ratio10.44N/A-
Revenue64.5B31.9M202,194%
Total CashN/A5.06M-
Total DebtN/A1.39M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIIHY vs DMGGF: Fundamental Ratings
CIIHY
DMGGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4894
SMR RATING
1..100
1294
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3955
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIIHY's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as DMGGF (63). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew similarly to DMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DMGGF (94). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DMGGF (94). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew significantly faster than DMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as DMGGF (55). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew similarly to DMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHY's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DMGGF (100). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew significantly faster than DMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIIHYDMGGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIIHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IFNNY43.330.45
+1.05%
Infineon Technologies AG
SBWFF0.11N/A
N/A
CORNISH METALS INC
TCOR0.57N/A
N/A
TreeCon Resources, Inc.
TMICF67.53N/A
N/A
Trend Micro Inc.
IOOFF1.30N/A
N/A
Insignia Financial Ltd.

CIIHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIIHY and FUTU have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIIHY and FUTU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIIHY
1D Price
Change %
CIIHY100%
+0.77%
FUTU - CIIHY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
TIGR - CIIHY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
DMGGF - CIIHY
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
CSOL - CIIHY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMSQF - CIIHY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DMGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMGGF has been loosely correlated with BBKCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMGGF jumps, then BBKCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMGGF
1D Price
Change %
DMGGF100%
+3.28%
BBKCF - DMGGF
52%
Loosely correlated
-6.29%
NPPTF - DMGGF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
ARBKF - DMGGF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
DEFT - DMGGF
34%
Loosely correlated
+5.72%
PIPR - DMGGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
More