CIIHY
Price
$30.10
Change
-$0.16 (-0.53%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
46.09B
CMSQF
Price
$24.81
Change
-$2.59 (-9.45%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
10.1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIIHY vs CMSQF

Header iconCIIHY vs CMSQF Comparison
Open Charts CIIHY vs CMSQFBanner chart's image
Citic Securities
Price$30.10
Change-$0.16 (-0.53%)
Volume$175
Capitalization46.09B
Computershare
Price$24.81
Change-$2.59 (-9.45%)
Volume$100
Capitalization10.1B
CIIHY vs CMSQF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIIHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIIHY vs. CMSQF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIIHY is a Buy and CMSQF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CIIHY: $30.10 vs. CMSQF: $24.81)
Brand notoriety: CIIHY and CMSQF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIIHY: 6% vs. CMSQF: 28%
Market capitalization -- CIIHY: $46.09B vs. CMSQF: $10.1B
CIIHY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $46.09B. CMSQF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $10.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIIHY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMSQF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIIHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMSQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIIHY is a better buy in the long-term than CMSQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIIHY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMSQF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIIHY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CMSQF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIIHY is a better buy in the short-term than CMSQF.

Price Growth

CIIHY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +8.90% price change this week, while CMSQF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -9.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIIHY($46.1B) has a higher market cap than CMSQF($10.1B). CMSQF has higher P/E ratio than CIIHY: CMSQF (29.59) vs CIIHY (10.44). CMSQF YTD gains are higher at: 31.618 vs. CIIHY (11.693). CIIHY has higher revenues than CMSQF: CIIHY (64.5B) vs CMSQF (2.9B).
CIIHYCMSQFCIIHY / CMSQF
Capitalization46.1B10.1B456%
EBITDAN/A825M-
Gain YTD11.69331.61837%
P/E Ratio10.4429.5935%
Revenue64.5B2.9B2,226%
Total CashN/A1.08B-
Total DebtN/A2.77B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIIHY vs CMSQF: Fundamental Ratings
CIIHY
CMSQF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
486
SMR RATING
1..100
1264
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1437
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIIHY's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CMSQF (37). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew similarly to CMSQF’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIIHY (48). This means that CMSQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIIHY’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMSQF (64). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMSQF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CMSQF (49). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew similarly to CMSQF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHY's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as CMSQF (37). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew similarly to CMSQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIIHYCMSQF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
15%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIIHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHZ.X0.0357220.000637
+1.82%
Chiliz cryptocurrency
XVS.X5.9219100.087703
+1.50%
Venus cryptocurrency
AST.X0.0418340.000557
+1.35%
AirSwap cryptocurrency
CBSH64.560.58
+0.91%
Commerce Bancshares Inc
MOB.X0.188289-0.000709
-0.38%
MobileCoin cryptocurrency

CIIHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIIHY and FUTU have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIIHY and FUTU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIIHY
1D Price
Change %
CIIHY100%
+0.77%
FUTU - CIIHY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
TIGR - CIIHY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
DMGGF - CIIHY
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
CSOL - CIIHY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMSQF - CIIHY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMSQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMSQF and CURN have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMSQF and CURN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMSQF
1D Price
Change %
CMSQF100%
N/A
CURN - CMSQF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
CIIHY - CMSQF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
CMSQY - CMSQF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
DBOEF - CMSQF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
CSOL - CMSQF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More