CIIHF
Price
$3.03
Change
+$0.48 (+18.82%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
46.09B
PIPR
Price
$293.44
Change
+$0.47 (+0.16%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.98B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIIHF vs PIPR

Header iconCIIHF vs PIPR Comparison
Open Charts CIIHF vs PIPRBanner chart's image
Citic Securities
Price$3.03
Change+$0.48 (+18.82%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization46.09B
Piper Sandler Companies
Price$293.44
Change+$0.47 (+0.16%)
Volume$91.18K
Capitalization2.98B
CIIHF vs PIPR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIIHF vs. PIPR commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIIHF is a Buy and PIPR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CIIHF: $3.03 vs. PIPR: $293.44)
Brand notoriety: CIIHF and PIPR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIIHF: 54% vs. PIPR: 59%
Market capitalization -- CIIHF: $46.09B vs. PIPR: $2.98B
CIIHF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $46.09B. PIPR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIIHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePIPR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIIHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PIPR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIIHF is a better buy in the long-term than PIPR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIIHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIPR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIIHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PIPR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the short-term than CIIHF.

Price Growth

CIIHF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

PIPR is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIIHF($46.1B) has a higher market cap than PIPR($2.98B). PIPR has higher P/E ratio than CIIHF: PIPR (39.76) vs CIIHF (8.61). CIIHF YTD gains are higher at: 13.598 vs. PIPR (-0.637). PIPR has less debt than CIIHF: PIPR (164M) vs CIIHF (201B). CIIHF has higher revenues than PIPR: CIIHF (64.5B) vs PIPR (1.3B).
CIIHFPIPRCIIHF / PIPR
Capitalization46.1B2.98B1,550%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.598-0.637-2,134%
P/E Ratio8.6139.7622%
Revenue64.5B1.3B4,962%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt201B164M122,561%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIIHF vs PIPR: Fundamental Ratings
CIIHF
PIPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4523
SMR RATING
1..100
1241
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1191
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIIHF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as PIPR (46). This means that CIIHF’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as CIIHF (45). This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to CIIHF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as PIPR (41). This means that CIIHF’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as PIPR (43). This means that CIIHF’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PIPR (91). This means that CIIHF’s stock grew significantly faster than PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIIHFPIPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APGCX63.540.61
+0.97%
AB Large Cap Growth C
GGLIX13.940.13
+0.94%
abrdn US Sustainable Leaders Instl
ICTTX15.000.10
+0.67%
ICON Health and Information Tech Inv
TBARX29.240.15
+0.52%
Touchstone Balanced R6
LGMNX26.180.08
+0.31%
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation N

CIIHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIIHF and GS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIIHF and GS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIIHF
1D Price
Change %
CIIHF100%
N/A
GS - CIIHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
HAFG - CIIHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCO - CIIHF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
PIPR - CIIHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
MS - CIIHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
More

PIPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIPR
1D Price
Change %
PIPR100%
+0.16%
EVR - PIPR
90%
Closely correlated
+1.68%
MC - PIPR
89%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
GS - PIPR
85%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
SF - PIPR
85%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
JEF - PIPR
85%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
More