CIIHF
Price
$3.65
Change
-$0.44 (-10.76%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
60.4B
MCO
Price
$504.81
Change
+$5.77 (+1.16%)
Updated
Sep 8, 01:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
89.51B
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIIHF vs MCO

Header iconCIIHF vs MCO Comparison
Open Charts CIIHF vs MCOBanner chart's image
Citic Securities
Price$3.65
Change-$0.44 (-10.76%)
Volume$250
Capitalization60.4B
Moody's
Price$504.81
Change+$5.77 (+1.16%)
Volume$100
Capitalization89.51B
CIIHF vs MCO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIIHF vs. MCO commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIIHF is a Hold and MCO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CIIHF: $3.65 vs. MCO: $499.03)
Brand notoriety: CIIHF and MCO are both not notable
CIIHF represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while MCO is part of the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIIHF: 30% vs. MCO: 81%
Market capitalization -- CIIHF: $60.4B vs. MCO: $89.51B
CIIHF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $60.4B. MCO’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $89.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $164.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIIHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMCO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CIIHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MCO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIIHF is a better buy in the long-term than MCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIIHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIIHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the short-term than CIIHF.

Price Growth

CIIHF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -10.76% price change this week, while MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -2.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +11.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.70%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+11.89% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.69% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCO($89.5B) has a higher market cap than CIIHF($60.4B). MCO has higher P/E ratio than CIIHF: MCO (42.43) vs CIIHF (16.19). CIIHF YTD gains are higher at: 36.843 vs. MCO (6.014). MCO has less debt than CIIHF: MCO (7.28B) vs CIIHF (211B).
CIIHFMCOCIIHF / MCO
Capitalization60.4B89.5B67%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.8436.014613%
P/E Ratio16.1942.4338%
Revenue67.7BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt211B7.28B2,898%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIIHF vs MCO: Fundamental Ratings
CIIHF
MCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3531
SMR RATING
1..100
1618
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
964
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIIHF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCO (86) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that CIIHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as CIIHF (35) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to CIIHF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHF's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (18) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that CIIHF’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (56) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that CIIHF’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCO (64) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that CIIHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIIHFMCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DDOG136.084.30
+3.26%
Datadog
CSW265.58-0.37
-0.14%
CSW Industrials Inc
ELMD24.47-0.44
-1.77%
Electromed
FWRD29.74-0.64
-2.11%
Forward Air Corp
GTEC1.29-0.04
-2.69%
Greenland Technologies Holding Corp

CIIHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIIHF and GS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIIHF and GS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIIHF
1D Price
Change %
CIIHF100%
N/A
GS - CIIHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
HAFG - CIIHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCO - CIIHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
PIPR - CIIHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
MS - CIIHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
More

MCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCO
1D Price
Change %
MCO100%
-0.15%
SPGI - MCO
85%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
NDAQ - MCO
77%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
MORN - MCO
75%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
TRU - MCO
74%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
MSCI - MCO
67%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
More