CIIHF vs MCO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIIHF is a Hold and MCO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CIIHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMCO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CIIHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MCO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MCO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CIIHF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MCO (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.73%.
Reported Earning Dates
MCO is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.21% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| CIIHF | MCO | CIIHF / MCO | |
| Capitalization | 46.1B | 71.9B | 64% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 2.49B | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 9.762 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 8.61 | 45.12 | 19% |
| Revenue | 64.5B | 5.73B | 1,126% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 201B | 7.27B | 2,764% |
CIIHF | MCO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 20 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CIIHF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCO (93) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that CIIHF’s stock grew significantly faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.
MCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIIHF (62) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIIHF’s over the last 12 months.
CIIHF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (18) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that CIIHF’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
MCO's Price Growth Rating (20) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as CIIHF (37) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to CIIHF’s over the last 12 months.
CIIHF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (45) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that CIIHF’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
| MCO | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 52% |
CIIHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CIIHF and GS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIIHF and GS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIIHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIIHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GS - CIIHF | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.76% | ||
| HAFG - CIIHF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MCO - CIIHF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
| PIPR - CIIHF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
| MS - CIIHF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
More | ||||
MCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCO | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| SPGI - MCO | 76% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| MORN - MCO | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| NDAQ - MCO | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| ICE - MCO | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| GS - MCO | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.76% | ||
More | ||||