CIIHF
Price
$3.65
Change
-$0.44 (-10.76%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
60.4B
HAFG
Price
$0.70
Change
+$0.02 (+2.94%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
49.64M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIIHF vs HAFG

Header iconCIIHF vs HAFG Comparison
Open Charts CIIHF vs HAFGBanner chart's image
Citic Securities
Price$3.65
Change-$0.44 (-10.76%)
Volume$250
Capitalization60.4B
Holistic Asset Finance Group
Price$0.70
Change+$0.02 (+2.94%)
Volume$100
Capitalization49.64M
CIIHF vs HAFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIIHF vs. HAFG commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIIHF is a Hold and HAFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CIIHF: $3.65 vs. HAFG: $0.70)
Brand notoriety: CIIHF and HAFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIIHF: 30% vs. HAFG: 21%
Market capitalization -- CIIHF: $60.4B vs. HAFG: $49.64M
CIIHF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $60.4B. HAFG’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $49.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIIHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHAFG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CIIHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HAFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIIHF is a better buy in the long-term than HAFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIIHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAFG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIIHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HAFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIIHF is a better buy in the short-term than HAFG.

Price Growth

CIIHF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -10.76% price change this week, while HAFG (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +3.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +11.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+11.89% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIIHF($60.4B) has a higher market cap than HAFG($49.6M). CIIHF YTD gains are higher at: 36.843 vs. HAFG (-6.668).
CIIHFHAFGCIIHF / HAFG
Capitalization60.4B49.6M121,774%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.843-6.668-552%
P/E Ratio16.19N/A-
Revenue67.7BN/A-
Total CashN/A6.79K-
Total Debt211BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIIHF vs HAFG: Fundamental Ratings
CIIHF
HAFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
1698
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3763
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIIHF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as HAFG (35). This means that CIIHF’s stock grew similarly to HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAFG (100). This means that CIIHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHF's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HAFG (98). This means that CIIHF’s stock grew significantly faster than HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as HAFG (63). This means that CIIHF’s stock grew similarly to HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HAFG (100). This means that CIIHF’s stock grew significantly faster than HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIIHFHAFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FINMY27.590.14
+0.51%
Leonardo S.P.A.
NSLYF17.95N/A
N/A
Nestle Malaysia BHD
PBTDF0.80N/A
N/A
PLOVER BAY TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
EVGDQ0.06N/A
N/A
Elevation Gold Mining Corporation
IVCAF11.02N/A
N/A
Investcorp AI Acquisition Corp.

CIIHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIIHF and GS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIIHF and GS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIIHF
1D Price
Change %
CIIHF100%
N/A
GS - CIIHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
HAFG - CIIHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCO - CIIHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
PIPR - CIIHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
MS - CIIHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
More

HAFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HAFG and CIIHF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAFG and CIIHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFG
1D Price
Change %
HAFG100%
N/A
CIIHF - HAFG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMXXF - HAFG
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBOEY - HAFG
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
HEXEY - HAFG
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PHIG - HAFG
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More