CIIHF
Price
$3.65
Change
-$0.44 (-10.76%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
60.4B
GS
Price
$736.09
Change
-$2.12 (-0.29%)
Updated
Sep 8, 12:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
223.47B
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIIHF vs GS

Header iconCIIHF vs GS Comparison
Open Charts CIIHF vs GSBanner chart's image
Citic Securities
Price$3.65
Change-$0.44 (-10.76%)
Volume$250
Capitalization60.4B
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$736.09
Change-$2.12 (-0.29%)
Volume$148
Capitalization223.47B
CIIHF vs GS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIIHF vs. GS commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIIHF is a Hold and GS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CIIHF: $3.65 vs. GS: $738.21)
Brand notoriety: CIIHF: Not notable vs. GS: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIIHF: 30% vs. GS: 97%
Market capitalization -- CIIHF: $60.4B vs. GS: $223.47B
CIIHF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $60.4B. GS’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $223.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIIHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CIIHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIIHF is a better buy in the long-term than GS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIIHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIIHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CIIHF and GS are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CIIHF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -10.76% price change this week, while GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +11.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

GS is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+11.89% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($223B) has a higher market cap than CIIHF($60.4B). GS (16.26) and CIIHF (16.19) have similar P/E ratio . CIIHF YTD gains are higher at: 36.843 vs. GS (30.900). CIIHF has less debt than GS: CIIHF (211B) vs GS (373B).
CIIHFGSCIIHF / GS
Capitalization60.4B223B27%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.84330.900119%
P/E Ratio16.1916.26100%
Revenue67.7BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt211B373B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIIHF vs GS: Fundamental Ratings
CIIHF
GS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3512
SMR RATING
1..100
165
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3712
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
945
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIIHF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GS (93) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CIIHF’s stock grew significantly faster than GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CIIHF (35) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to CIIHF’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CIIHF (16) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to CIIHF’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CIIHF (37) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to CIIHF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GS (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that CIIHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIIHFGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DDOG136.084.30
+3.26%
Datadog
CSW265.58-0.37
-0.14%
CSW Industrials Inc
ELMD24.47-0.44
-1.77%
Electromed
FWRD29.74-0.64
-2.11%
Forward Air Corp
GTEC1.29-0.04
-2.69%
Greenland Technologies Holding Corp

CIIHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIIHF and GS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIIHF and GS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIIHF
1D Price
Change %
CIIHF100%
N/A
GS - CIIHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
HAFG - CIIHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCO - CIIHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
PIPR - CIIHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
MS - CIIHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
More

GS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GS
1D Price
Change %
GS100%
-1.43%
EVR - GS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
SF - GS
88%
Closely correlated
-2.71%
JEF - GS
85%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
MC - GS
83%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
LAZ - GS
83%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
More