CIHHF
Price
$6.50
Change
+$1.41 (+27.70%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
151.4B
MTPOF
Price
$1.33
Change
+$0.02 (+1.53%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.46B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIHHF vs MTPOF

Header iconCIHHF vs MTPOF Comparison
Open Charts CIHHF vs MTPOFBanner chart's image
China Merchants Bank
Price$6.50
Change+$1.41 (+27.70%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization151.4B
Metropolitan Bank & Trust
Price$1.33
Change+$0.02 (+1.53%)
Volume$334
Capitalization5.46B
CIHHF vs MTPOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MTPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIHHF vs. MTPOF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIHHF is a Buy and MTPOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CIHHF: $6.50 vs. MTPOF: $1.33)
Brand notoriety: CIHHF and MTPOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIHHF: 100% vs. MTPOF: 21%
Market capitalization -- CIHHF: $151.4B vs. MTPOF: $5.46B
CIHHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $151.4B. MTPOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIHHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTPOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIHHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MTPOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIHHF is a better buy in the long-term than MTPOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTPOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MTPOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

CIHHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MTPOF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIHHF($151B) has a higher market cap than MTPOF($5.46B). CIHHF has higher P/E ratio than MTPOF: CIHHF (8.20) vs MTPOF (6.95). CIHHF YTD gains are higher at: 38.593 vs. MTPOF (12.310). MTPOF has less debt than CIHHF: MTPOF (105B) vs CIHHF (438B). CIHHF has higher revenues than MTPOF: CIHHF (332B) vs MTPOF (151B).
CIHHFMTPOFCIHHF / MTPOF
Capitalization151B5.46B2,767%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.59312.310313%
P/E Ratio8.206.95118%
Revenue332B151B220%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt438B105B417%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIHHF vs MTPOF: Fundamental Ratings
CIHHF
MTPOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8049
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1582
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIHHF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (57). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CIHHF (80). This means that MTPOF’s stock grew similarly to CIHHF’s over the last 12 months.

MTPOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CIHHF (1). This means that MTPOF’s stock grew similarly to CIHHF’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as MTPOF (57). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew similarly to MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

CIHHF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTPOF (82). This means that CIHHF’s stock grew significantly faster than MTPOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIHHFMTPOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MTPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RING56.941.72
+3.11%
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
TBFG28.890.07
+0.24%
The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
BCUS32.290.01
+0.02%
BANCREEK U.S. Large Cap ETF
FFLV22.98-0.09
-0.39%
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
HOOG60.57-1.89
-3.03%
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF

CIHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIHHF has been loosely correlated with CAIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIHHF jumps, then CAIB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIHHF
1D Price
Change %
CIHHF100%
N/A
CAIB - CIHHF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CIWV - CIHHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
CIHKY - CIHHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
MTPOF - CIHHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
SBGOF - CIHHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
More

MTPOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTPOF has been loosely correlated with SBGOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTPOF jumps, then SBGOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTPOF
1D Price
Change %
MTPOF100%
+1.60%
SBGOF - MTPOF
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
HSNGF - MTPOF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIHHF - MTPOF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSNHF - MTPOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBNNF - MTPOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More