Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIGEX vs NPFCX
CIGEX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CIGEX vs NPFCX
Calamos Global Equity I
Price$18.81
Change-$0.10 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets167.9M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$66.95
Change-$0.41 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
CIGEX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIGEX vs. NPFCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIGEX is a Hold and NPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. CIGEX (168M). NPFCX pays higher dividends than CIGEX: NPFCX (0.35) vs CIGEX (0.00). CIGEX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: CIGEX (19 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CIGEX (1.17). CIGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIGEX: NPFCX (250) vs CIGEX (1000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.81 vs. CIGEX (8.73). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.93 vs. CIGEX (12.95).
| CIGEX | NPFCX | CIGEX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.48 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.48 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.616 | 2.198 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 168M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | 16.81 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.58 | 42.54 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.95 | 14.93 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.34 | 114.03 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers