Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIGEX vs FNPFX
CIGEX vs FNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CIGEX vs FNPFX
Calamos Global Equity I
Price$18.63
Change-$0.18 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.93M
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$67.59
Change-$0.81 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.4B
CIGEX vs FNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIGEX vs. FNPFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIGEX is a Buy and FNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 152B vs. CIGEX (144M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than CIGEX: FNPFX (0.82) vs CIGEX (0.00). CIGEX was incepted earlier than FNPFX: CIGEX (18 years) vs FNPFX (8 years). CIGEX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). CIGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). CIGEX (1000000) and FNPFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.28 vs. CIGEX (0.43). FNPFX (49.86) and CIGEX (48.94) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CIGEX | FNPFX | CIGEX / FNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.41 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.41 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.275 | 8.841 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 144M | 152B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.82 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.43 | 9.28 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.39 | 44.00 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.94 | 49.86 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement