CIG
Price
$1.83
Change
+$0.01 (+0.55%)
Updated
May 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.81B
89 days until earnings call
FTS
Price
$47.15
Change
-$0.14 (-0.30%)
Updated
May 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
19.48B
77 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CIG vs FTS

Header iconCIG vs FTS Comparison
Open Charts CIG vs FTSBanner chart's image
Companhia Energetica De Minas Gerais-CEMIG
Price$1.83
Change+$0.01 (+0.55%)
Volume$11.21K
Capitalization5.81B
Fortis
Price$47.15
Change-$0.14 (-0.30%)
Volume$5.81K
Capitalization19.48B
CIG vs FTS Comparison Chart
Loading...
CIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIG vs. FTS commentary
May 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIG is a Hold and FTS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CIG: $1.82 vs. FTS: $47.29)
Brand notoriety: CIG and FTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIG: 98% vs. FTS: 373%
Market capitalization -- CIG: $5.81B vs. FTS: $19.48B
CIG [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $5.81B. FTS’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $19.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CIG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIG is a better buy in the long-term than FTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIG is a better buy in the short-term than FTS.

Price Growth

CIG (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +0.96% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was -2.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIG is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

FTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.80% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTS($19.5B) has a higher market cap than CIG($5.81B). FTS has higher P/E ratio than CIG: FTS (17.13) vs CIG (5.23). FTS YTD gains are higher at: 13.760 vs. CIG (11.555). CIG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10B vs. FTS (5.15B). CIG has higher revenues than FTS: CIG (35.9B) vs FTS (11.5B).
CIGFTSCIG / FTS
Capitalization5.81B19.5B30%
EBITDA10B5.15B194%
Gain YTD11.55513.76084%
P/E Ratio5.2317.1331%
Revenue35.9B11.5B312%
Total CashN/A625M-
Total DebtN/A30B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIG vs FTS: Fundamental Ratings
CIG
FTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2768
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
457
SMR RATING
1..100
4178
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7436
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
32n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIG's Valuation (2) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (59) in the null industry. This means that CIG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s over the last 12 months.

CIG's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (57) in the null industry. This means that CIG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s over the last 12 months.

CIG's SMR Rating (41) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (78) in the null industry. This means that CIG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s over the last 12 months.

CIG's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (52) in the null industry. This means that CIG’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIG (74) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIGFTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
40%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CIG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY590.462.87
+0.49%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X103744.640000205.226560
+0.20%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME28.63-0.10
-0.35%
GameStop Corp
AAPL211.45-0.88
-0.41%
Apple
TSLA342.82-4.86
-1.40%
Tesla

CIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIG has been loosely correlated with ELP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIG jumps, then ELP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIG
1D Price
Change %
CIG100%
+0.55%
ELP - CIG
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
ELPC - CIG
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
KEN - CIG
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
DIPGF - CIG
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTS - CIG
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
More

FTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been loosely correlated with NWE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then NWE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTS
1D Price
Change %
FTS100%
+1.79%
NWE - FTS
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
DUK - FTS
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.09%
UTL - FTS
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.64%
AEP - FTS
56%
Loosely correlated
+3.06%
WEC - FTS
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.61%
More