CIFR
Price
$18.76
Change
+$0.04 (+0.21%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
7.38B
19 days until earnings call
RIOT
Price
$20.03
Change
+$0.48 (+2.46%)
Updated
Oct 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.4B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIFR vs RIOT

Header iconCIFR vs RIOT Comparison
Open Charts CIFR vs RIOTBanner chart's image
Cipher Mining
Price$18.76
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
Volume$52.92M
Capitalization7.38B
Riot Platforms
Price$20.03
Change+$0.48 (+2.46%)
Volume$119.9K
Capitalization7.4B
CIFR vs RIOT Comparison Chart in %
CIFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RIOT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIFR vs. RIOT commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIFR is a Hold and RIOT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CIFR: $18.72 vs. RIOT: $19.55)
Brand notoriety: CIFR and RIOT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIFR: 108% vs. RIOT: 63%
Market capitalization -- CIFR: $7.38B vs. RIOT: $7.4B
CIFR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $7.38B. RIOT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIFR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRIOT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CIFR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RIOT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIFR is a better buy in the long-term than RIOT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIFR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RIOT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIFR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RIOT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIFR is a better buy in the short-term than RIOT.

Price Growth

CIFR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +4.06% price change this week, while RIOT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -12.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +85.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIFR is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

RIOT is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.54% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIOT($7.4B) and CIFR($7.38B) have the same market capitalization . CIFR has higher P/E ratio than RIOT: CIFR (78.82) vs RIOT (22.85). CIFR YTD gains are higher at: 304.310 vs. RIOT (91.479). RIOT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 220M vs. CIFR (-1.91M). RIOT has more cash in the bank: 318M vs. CIFR (62.7M). CIFR has less debt than RIOT: CIFR (189M) vs RIOT (870M). RIOT has higher revenues than CIFR: RIOT (542M) vs CIFR (159M).
CIFRRIOTCIFR / RIOT
Capitalization7.38B7.4B100%
EBITDA-1.91M220M-1%
Gain YTD304.31091.479333%
P/E Ratio78.8222.85345%
Revenue159M542M29%
Total Cash62.7M318M20%
Total Debt189M870M22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RIOT: Fundamental Ratings
RIOT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIFRRIOT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RIOT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ELCRX43.560.15
+0.35%
Eaton Vance Growth R
RNPBX68.530.12
+0.18%
American Funds New Perspective R2
SFVLX16.61-0.02
-0.12%
Seafarer Overseas Value Investor
HFMTX34.70-0.13
-0.37%
Hartford MidCap R5
NRINX24.62-0.17
-0.69%
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value R6

CIFR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIFR has been closely correlated with HUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIFR jumps, then HUT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIFR
1D Price
Change %
CIFR100%
+0.21%
HUT - CIFR
79%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
RIOT - CIFR
79%
Closely correlated
+2.46%
IREN - CIFR
77%
Closely correlated
-1.80%
WULF - CIFR
74%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
HIVE - CIFR
72%
Closely correlated
-2.23%
More

RIOT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RIOT has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RIOT jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RIOT
1D Price
Change %
RIOT100%
-11.66%
MARA - RIOT
89%
Closely correlated
-11.27%
HUT - RIOT
80%
Closely correlated
-9.52%
MSTR - RIOT
79%
Closely correlated
-4.35%
CIFR - RIOT
79%
Closely correlated
-10.98%
COIN - RIOT
77%
Closely correlated
-1.80%
More