CICOF
Price
$1.70
Change
-$0.02 (-1.16%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
32.3B
DLPTF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.46B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CICOF vs DLPTF

Header iconCICOF vs DLPTF Comparison
Open Charts CICOF vs DLPTFBanner chart's image
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
Price$1.70
Change-$0.02 (-1.16%)
Volume$10.89K
Capitalization32.3B
LIAONING PORT
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization4.46B
CICOF vs DLPTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CICOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DLPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CICOF vs. DLPTF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CICOF is a Hold and DLPTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CICOF: $1.70 vs. DLPTF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: CICOF and DLPTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CICOF: 279% vs. DLPTF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CICOF: $32.15B vs. DLPTF: $4.46B
CICOF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $32.15B. DLPTF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $4.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CICOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDLPTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CICOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DLPTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CICOF is a better buy in the long-term than DLPTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CICOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DLPTF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CICOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DLPTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DLPTF is a better buy in the short-term than CICOF.

Price Growth

CICOF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +2.41% price change this week, while DLPTF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+3.18% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CICOF($32.3B) has a higher market cap than DLPTF($4.46B). DLPTF has higher P/E ratio than CICOF: DLPTF (15.24) vs CICOF (3.96). CICOF YTD gains are higher at: 3.659 vs. DLPTF (-1.163).
CICOFDLPTFCICOF / DLPTF
Capitalization32.3B4.46B724%
EBITDAN/A1.68B-
Gain YTD3.659-1.163-315%
P/E Ratio3.9615.2426%
RevenueN/A10.7B-
Total CashN/A5.88B-
Total DebtN/A12.7B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CICOF vs DLPTF: Fundamental Ratings
CICOF
DLPTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36100
SMR RATING
1..100
2087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9714
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CICOF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as DLPTF (26). This means that CICOF’s stock grew similarly to DLPTF’s over the last 12 months.

CICOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DLPTF (100). This means that CICOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DLPTF’s over the last 12 months.

CICOF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DLPTF (87). This means that CICOF’s stock grew significantly faster than DLPTF’s over the last 12 months.

CICOF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as DLPTF (58). This means that CICOF’s stock grew similarly to DLPTF’s over the last 12 months.

DLPTF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CICOF (97). This means that DLPTF’s stock grew significantly faster than CICOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CICOFDLPTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CICOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DLPTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EOSE5.080.18
+3.67%
Eos Energy Enterprises
MRUS53.820.49
+0.92%
Merus NV
GEHC76.07-0.05
-0.07%
GE HealthCare Technologies
MSEX55.57-0.32
-0.57%
Middlesex Water Company
ONMD0.55-0.08
-12.54%
OneMedNet Corp

CICOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CICOF and AMKAF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CICOF and AMKAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CICOF
1D Price
Change %
CICOF100%
N/A
AMKAF - CICOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
MPZZF - CICOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.23%
AMKBY - CICOF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
BWLP - CICOF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
CICOY - CICOF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DLPTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DLPTF and CICOY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DLPTF and CICOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DLPTF
1D Price
Change %
DLPTF100%
N/A
CICOY - DLPTF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CICOF - DLPTF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLAGF - DLPTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAIKY - DLPTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HHULF - DLPTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More