CICHF
Price
$1.06
Change
+$0.04 (+3.92%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
270.41B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IDCBY
Price
$16.25
Change
-$0.16 (-0.98%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
377.41B
112 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CICHF vs IDCBY

Header iconCICHF vs IDCBY Comparison
Open Charts CICHF vs IDCBYBanner chart's image
China Construction Bank
Price$1.06
Change+$0.04 (+3.92%)
Volume$2.23K
Capitalization270.41B
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Price$16.25
Change-$0.16 (-0.98%)
Volume$23.41K
Capitalization377.41B
CICHF vs IDCBY Comparison Chart in %
CICHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IDCBY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CICHF vs. IDCBY commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CICHF is a Hold and IDCBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CICHF: $1.06 vs. IDCBY: $16.25)
Brand notoriety: CICHF and IDCBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CICHF: 2% vs. IDCBY: 38%
Market capitalization -- CICHF: $272.94B vs. IDCBY: $377.71B
CICHF [@Major Banks] is valued at $272.94B. IDCBY’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $377.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $849.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $141B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CICHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIDCBY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CICHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IDCBY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IDCBY is a better buy in the long-term than CICHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CICHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IDCBY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CICHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IDCBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CICHF is a better buy in the short-term than IDCBY.

Price Growth

CICHF (@Major Banks) experienced а +3.41% price change this week, while IDCBY (@Major Banks) price change was -2.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

IDCBY is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.77% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDCBY($377B) has a higher market cap than CICHF($270B). IDCBY (5.80) and CICHF (5.77) have similar P/E ratio . IDCBY YTD gains are higher at: 30.029 vs. CICHF (23.256). IDCBY has less debt than CICHF: IDCBY (3.19T) vs CICHF (3.43T). IDCBY has higher revenues than CICHF: IDCBY (823B) vs CICHF (758B).
CICHFIDCBYCICHF / IDCBY
Capitalization270B377B72%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.25630.02977%
P/E Ratio5.775.8099%
Revenue758B823B92%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.43T3.19T108%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CICHF vs IDCBY: Fundamental Ratings
CICHF
IDCBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
180
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5515
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1718
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7542

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IDCBY's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CICHF (79). This means that IDCBY’s stock grew similarly to CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CICHF (55). This means that IDCBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CICHF (1). This means that IDCBY’s stock grew similarly to CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

IDCBY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CICHF (48). This means that IDCBY’s stock grew similarly to CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

CICHF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as IDCBY (18). This means that CICHF’s stock grew similarly to IDCBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CICHFIDCBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CICHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IDCBY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNTX1.090.03
+2.83%
Context Therapeutics
FFIC16.920.32
+1.93%
Flushing Financial Corp
TOWN34.050.40
+1.19%
TowneBank
NVT104.97-0.39
-0.37%
nVent Electric plc
CLIK5.56-0.18
-3.14%
Click Holdings Limited

CICHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CICHF and CICHY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CICHF and CICHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CICHF
1D Price
Change %
CICHF100%
+3.92%
CICHY - CICHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
BACHY - CICHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.66%
IDCBY - CICHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
ACGBY - CICHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
HBCYF - CICHF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
More

IDCBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IDCBY has been closely correlated with CICHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IDCBY jumps, then CICHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDCBY
1D Price
Change %
IDCBY100%
-0.98%
CICHY - IDCBY
91%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
BACHY - IDCBY
81%
Closely correlated
-3.66%
ACGBY - IDCBY
78%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
SCBFY - IDCBY
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
HSBC - IDCBY
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
More