CICHF
Price
$0.98
Change
+$0.01 (+1.02%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
263.22B
HBCYF
Price
$13.03
Change
+$0.32 (+2.52%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
224.13B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CICHF vs HBCYF

Header iconCICHF vs HBCYF Comparison
Open Charts CICHF vs HBCYFBanner chart's image
China Construction Bank
Price$0.98
Change+$0.01 (+1.02%)
Volume$26.82K
Capitalization263.22B
HSBC Holdings
Price$13.03
Change+$0.32 (+2.52%)
Volume$54.68K
Capitalization224.13B
CICHF vs HBCYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CICHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CICHF vs. HBCYF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CICHF is a Buy and HBCYF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CICHF: $0.99 vs. HBCYF: $13.02)
Brand notoriety: CICHF and HBCYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CICHF: 44% vs. HBCYF: 298%
Market capitalization -- CICHF: $263.22B vs. HBCYF: $224.13B
CICHF [@Major Banks] is valued at $263.22B. HBCYF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $224.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $133.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CICHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHBCYF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CICHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HBCYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBCYF is a better buy in the long-term than CICHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CICHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBCYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CICHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HBCYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCYF is a better buy in the short-term than CICHF.

Price Growth

CICHF (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.51% price change this week, while HBCYF (@Major Banks) price change was +3.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CICHF($263B) has a higher market cap than HBCYF($224B). HBCYF has higher P/E ratio than CICHF: HBCYF (12.90) vs CICHF (5.41). HBCYF YTD gains are higher at: 44.177 vs. CICHF (14.535). HBCYF has less debt than CICHF: HBCYF (130B) vs CICHF (3.36T).
CICHFHBCYFCICHF / HBCYF
Capitalization263B224B117%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.53544.17733%
P/E Ratio5.4112.9042%
Revenue739BN/A-
Total CashN/A246B-
Total Debt3.36T130B2,582%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CICHF vs HBCYF: Fundamental Ratings
CICHF
HBCYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
616
SMR RATING
1..100
13
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBCYF's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as CICHF (81). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CICHF (61). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

CICHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as HBCYF (3). This means that CICHF’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CICHF (50). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CICHF (20). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CICHFHBCYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CICHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSTR335.878.28
+2.53%
Strategy Inc
MRP34.21-0.02
-0.06%
Millrose Properties Inc
AUDC9.67-0.03
-0.31%
AudioCodes Ltd
PCRX26.45-0.28
-1.05%
Pacira BioSciences
RAIN4.40-0.15
-3.30%
RAIN ENHANCEMENT TECHNOLOGIES HOLDCO INC

CICHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CICHF and ACGBY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CICHF and ACGBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CICHF
1D Price
Change %
CICHF100%
+0.51%
ACGBY - CICHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
CICHY - CICHF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
FANDY - CICHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNDSF - CICHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBCYF - CICHF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
More

HBCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCYF has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBCYF jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCYF
1D Price
Change %
HBCYF100%
+2.56%
HSBC - HBCYF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
SCBFY - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
SMFNF - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
BCS - HBCYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
ING - HBCYF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
More