CICHF
Price
$0.95
Change
-$0.03 (-3.06%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
147.98B
HBCYF
Price
$12.62
Change
-$0.39 (-3.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
163.92B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CICHF vs HBCYF

Header iconCICHF vs HBCYF Comparison
Open Charts CICHF vs HBCYFBanner chart's image
China Construction Bank
Price$0.95
Change-$0.03 (-3.06%)
Volume$13K
Capitalization147.98B
HSBC Holdings
Price$12.62
Change-$0.39 (-3.00%)
Volume$9.87K
Capitalization163.92B
CICHF vs HBCYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CICHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CICHF vs. HBCYF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CICHF is a Hold and HBCYF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CICHF: $0.95 vs. HBCYF: $12.61)
Brand notoriety: CICHF and HBCYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CICHF: 24% vs. HBCYF: 70%
Market capitalization -- CICHF: $147.98B vs. HBCYF: $163.92B
CICHF [@Major Banks] is valued at $147.98B. HBCYF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $163.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CICHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHBCYF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CICHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HBCYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CICHF and HBCYF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CICHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBCYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CICHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HBCYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCYF is a better buy in the short-term than CICHF.

Price Growth

CICHF (@Major Banks) experienced а -9.52% price change this week, while HBCYF (@Major Banks) price change was +0.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.63% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCYF($164B) has a higher market cap than CICHF($148B). HBCYF has higher P/E ratio than CICHF: HBCYF (6.92) vs CICHF (3.16). HBCYF YTD gains are higher at: 38.556 vs. CICHF (10.465). HBCYF has less debt than CICHF: HBCYF (85.4B) vs CICHF (2.12T). CICHF has higher revenues than HBCYF: CICHF (823B) vs HBCYF (71.3B).
CICHFHBCYFCICHF / HBCYF
Capitalization148B164B90%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.46538.55627%
P/E Ratio3.166.9246%
Revenue823B71.3B1,154%
Total CashN/A327B-
Total Debt2.12T85.4B2,480%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CICHF vs HBCYF: Fundamental Ratings
CICHF
HBCYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
737
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1715
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CICHF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBCYF (67). This means that CICHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CICHF (73). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew significantly faster than CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

CICHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as HBCYF (2). This means that CICHF’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CICHF (50). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as CICHF (17). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CICHFHBCYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CICHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LBTYB9.94N/A
N/A
Liberty Global Ltd
AZN72.66-1.02
-1.38%
AstraZeneca PLC
NEXT11.32-0.18
-1.57%
NextDecade Corp
HIVE2.27-0.13
-5.42%
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd
LSB1.15-0.16
-12.21%
LakeShore Biopharma Co Ltd

CICHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CICHF and ACGBY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CICHF and ACGBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CICHF
1D Price
Change %
CICHF100%
-3.06%
ACGBY - CICHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
CICHY - CICHF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
FANDY - CICHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNDSF - CICHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBCYF - CICHF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
More

HBCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCYF has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBCYF jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCYF
1D Price
Change %
HBCYF100%
-2.96%
HSBC - HBCYF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
SCBFY - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
SMFNF - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
BCS - HBCYF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
ING - HBCYF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
More