CIBR | WFH | CIBR / WFH | |
Gain YTD | 16.003 | 4.903 | 326% |
Net Assets | 10.4B | 13.4M | 77,612% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.45 | 131% |
Turnover | 39.00 | N/A | - |
Yield | 0.25 | 0.96 | 27% |
Fund Existence | 10 years | 5 years | - |
CIBR | WFH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 2 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 2 days ago87% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 2 days ago88% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 2 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 2 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 4 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 3 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 2 days ago88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR | 100% | +1.60% | ||
CRWD - CIBR | 83% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
ZS - CIBR | 75% Closely correlated | +2.22% | ||
NET - CIBR | 73% Closely correlated | +2.12% | ||
CSCO - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | -1.60% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that WFH and PEGA have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WFH and PEGA's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WFH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WFH | 100% | +0.64% | ||
PEGA - WFH | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
IBM - WFH | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.26% | ||
FTNT - WFH | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
ORCL - WFH | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
S - WFH | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.72% | ||
More |