Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs SPAM
CIBR vs SPAM Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs SPAM
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$66.06
Change-$1.03 (-1.54%)
Volume$1.86K
Net Assets10.31B
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Price$28.73
Change-$0.63 (-2.15%)
Volume$100
Net Assets2.35M
CIBR vs SPAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. SPAM commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and SPAM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 10.3B vs. SPAM (2.35M). SPAM has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: SPAM (-4.191) vs CIBR (-6.102). CIBR was incepted earlier than SPAM: CIBR (11 years) vs SPAM (2 years). SPAM (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). SPAM has a higher turnover CIBR (21.00) vs CIBR (21.00).
| CIBR | SPAM | CIBR / SPAM | |
| Gain YTD | -6.102 | -4.191 | 146% |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 2.35M | 438,858% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.35 | 169% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 38.00 | 55% |
| Yield | 0.44 | 0.49 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 9 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -3.59% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 83% Closely correlated | -3.90% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -5.23% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -6.26% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 73% Closely correlated | -6.64% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | -4.82% | ||
More | ||||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPAM and BAH have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPAM and BAH's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | -3.71% | ||
| BAH - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -5.14% | ||
| RDWR - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.55% | ||
| CACI - SPAM | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| S - SPAM | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ARQQ - SPAM | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.88% | ||
More | ||||