Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs SPAM
CIBR vs SPAM Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs SPAM
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$75.12
Change+$0.30 (+0.40%)
Volume$780.59K
Net Assets11.1B
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Price$34.42
Change-$0.28 (-0.81%)
Volume$998
Net Assets2.08M
CIBR vs SPAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. SPAM commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and SPAM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11.1B vs. SPAM (2.08M). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than SPAM: CIBR (18.543) vs SPAM (17.223). CIBR was incepted earlier than SPAM: CIBR (10 years) vs SPAM (2 years). SPAM (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). CIBR has a higher turnover SPAM (24.00) vs SPAM (24.00).
| CIBR | SPAM | CIBR / SPAM | |
| Gain YTD | 18.543 | 17.223 | 108% |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 2.08M | 534,682% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.35 | 169% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 24.00 | 163% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.11 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 83% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
More | ||||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPAM and BAH have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPAM and BAH's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | -0.79% | ||
| BAH - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
| RDWR - SPAM | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| FSLY - SPAM | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
| QLYS - SPAM | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| OKTA - SPAM | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||