Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs SPAM
CIBR vs SPAM Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs SPAM
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$72.45
Change-$0.17 (-0.23%)
Volume$5.97K
Net Assets10.98B
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Price$31.57
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
Volume$770
Net Assets2.53M
CIBR vs SPAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. SPAM commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and SPAM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11B vs. SPAM (2.53M). SPAM has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: SPAM (3.163) vs CIBR (1.638). CIBR was incepted earlier than SPAM: CIBR (11 years) vs SPAM (2 years). SPAM (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). SPAM has a higher turnover CIBR (21.00) vs CIBR (21.00).
| CIBR | SPAM | CIBR / SPAM | |
| Gain YTD | 1.638 | 3.163 | 52% |
| Net Assets | 11B | 2.53M | 435,299% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.35 | 169% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 38.00 | 55% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.07 | 644% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 24 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 82% | 13 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 72% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
More | ||||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPAM and BAH have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPAM and BAH's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | -1.33% | ||
| BAH - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
| RDWR - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
| FSLY - SPAM | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| OKTA - SPAM | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| QLYS - SPAM | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.53% | ||
More | ||||