Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs SPAM
CIBR vs SPAM Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs SPAM
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$74.82
Change-$1.24 (-1.63%)
Volume$6.87K
Net Assets11.5B
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Price$33.04
Change-$1.03 (-3.02%)
Volume$640
Net Assets2.77M
CIBR vs SPAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. SPAM commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Buy and SPAM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11.5B vs. SPAM (2.77M). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than SPAM: CIBR (20.027) vs SPAM (16.020). CIBR was incepted earlier than SPAM: CIBR (10 years) vs SPAM (2 years). SPAM (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). CIBR has a higher turnover SPAM (24.00) vs SPAM (24.00).
| CIBR | SPAM | CIBR / SPAM | |
| Gain YTD | 20.027 | 16.020 | 125% |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 2.77M | 415,913% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.35 | 169% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 24.00 | 163% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.11 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 10 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -1.04% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 71% Closely correlated | -3.95% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | -3.41% | ||
More | ||||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPAM and BAH have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPAM and BAH's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | -1.94% | ||
| BAH - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.55% | ||
| RDWR - SPAM | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
| FSLY - SPAM | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| OKTA - SPAM | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| QLYS - SPAM | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.44% | ||
More | ||||