Intraday BUY SELL Signals
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs S
CIBR vs S Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs S
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$75.76
Change-$0.34 (-0.45%)
Volume$538.26K
Net Assets11.38B
SentinelOne
Price$14.99
Change-$0.25 (-1.64%)
Volume$18.27M
Capitalization5.09B
CIBR vs S Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. S commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Buy and S is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
S: Fundamental Ratings
S | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | S | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 81% | 23 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 73% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 71% Closely correlated | -2.58% | ||
More | ||||
S and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if S jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y