Advertisement
CIBR vs PANW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and PANW is a StrongBuy.
PANW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CIBR | PANW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 22 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 51% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UBR | 37.42 | 1.21 | +3.35% |
| ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil Capped | |||
| FRDM | 59.18 | 0.95 | +1.63% |
| Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | |||
| PCEM | 12.43 | 0.04 | +0.35% |
| Polen Capital Em Mkts ex-China Gr ETF | |||
| HIX | 4.18 | -0.04 | -0.95% |
| Western Asset High Income Fund II | |||
| AOTG | 52.32 | -1.95 | -3.59% |
| AOT Growth and Innovation ETF | |||
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -3.59% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 83% Closely correlated | -3.90% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -5.23% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -6.26% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 73% Closely correlated | -6.64% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | -4.82% | ||
More | ||||
PANW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | 100% | -5.23% | ||
| CRWD - PANW | 72% Closely correlated | -3.90% | ||
| ZS - PANW | 69% Closely correlated | -6.26% | ||
| NOW - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | -6.97% | ||
| CYBR - PANW | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.82% | ||
| FTNT - PANW | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.45% | ||
More | ||||