Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs NBXG
CIBR vs NBXG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. NBXG commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Buy and NBXG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11.5B vs. NBXG (1.34B). NBXG has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: NBXG (26.321) vs CIBR (20.027). CIBR was incepted earlier than NBXG: CIBR (10 years) vs NBXG (4 years). CIBR (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than NBXG (1.30). NBXG has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | NBXG | CIBR / NBXG | |
| Gain YTD | 20.027 | 26.321 | 76% |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 1.34B | 860% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.30 | 45% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 56.00 | 70% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | NBXG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -1.04% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 71% Closely correlated | -3.95% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | -3.41% | ||
More | ||||
NBXG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NBXG and META have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBXG and META's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBXG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBXG | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| META - NBXG | 13% Poorly correlated | -2.88% | ||
| MPWR - NBXG | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
| TSM - NBXG | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
| AMAT - NBXG | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| ASML - NBXG | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.46% | ||
More | ||||