Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs NBDS
CIBR vs NBDS Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs NBDS
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$74.67
Change-$0.09 (-0.12%)
Volume$6.72K
Net Assets11.36B
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
Price$35.83
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
Volume$140
Net Assets29.87M
CIBR vs NBDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. NBDS commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and NBDS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11.4B vs. NBDS (29.9M). NBDS has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: NBDS (20.305) vs CIBR (17.975). CIBR was incepted earlier than NBDS: CIBR (10 years) vs NBDS (4 years). NBDS (0.55) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). NBDS has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | NBDS | CIBR / NBDS | |
| Gain YTD | 17.975 | 20.305 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 29.9M | 38,127% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.55 | 107% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 49.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | NBDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -1.71% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -2.67% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -2.51% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 71% Closely correlated | -5.38% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | -2.43% | ||
More | ||||
NBDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBDS has been loosely correlated with ARM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NBDS jumps, then ARM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBDS | 100% | -3.59% | ||
| ARM - NBDS | 63% Loosely correlated | -5.67% | ||
| RDDT - NBDS | 59% Loosely correlated | -6.61% | ||
| NXT - NBDS | 28% Poorly correlated | -8.72% | ||
| GTM - NBDS | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.11% | ||
| DOCN - NBDS | 5% Poorly correlated | -6.57% | ||
More | ||||