Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs NBDS
CIBR vs NBDS Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs NBDS
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$75.80
Change+$0.41 (+0.54%)
Volume$720
Net Assets11B
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
Price$35.54
Change-$0.35 (-0.98%)
Volume$2.59K
Net Assets27.69M
CIBR vs NBDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. NBDS commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and NBDS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11B vs. NBDS (27.7M). NBDS (19.414) and CIBR (18.969) have matching annual dividend yield . CIBR was incepted earlier than NBDS: CIBR (10 years) vs NBDS (3 years). NBDS (0.55) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). NBDS has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | NBDS | CIBR / NBDS | |
| Gain YTD | 18.969 | 19.414 | 98% |
| Net Assets | 11B | 27.7M | 39,711% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.55 | 107% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 49.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | NBDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| FTNT - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||
NBDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NBDS and AMZN have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBDS and AMZN's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBDS | 100% | -0.96% | ||
| AMZN - NBDS | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| HUBS - NBDS | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.68% | ||
| LLY - NBDS | 16% Poorly correlated | -3.67% | ||
| MRNA - NBDS | 15% Poorly correlated | -4.91% | ||
| PCOR - NBDS | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.39% | ||
More | ||||