Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs IQM
CIBR vs IQM Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs IQM
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$73.51
Change+$1.16 (+1.60%)
Volume$688.59K
Net Assets10.59B
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
Price$80.97
Change+$1.35 (+1.70%)
Volume$3.1K
Net Assets44.54M
CIBR vs IQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. IQM commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a StrongBuy and IQM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 10.6B vs. IQM (44.5M). IQM has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: IQM (21.123) vs CIBR (16.003). CIBR was incepted earlier than IQM: CIBR (10 years) vs IQM (6 years). IQM (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). IQM has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | IQM | CIBR / IQM | |
| Gain YTD | 16.003 | 21.123 | 76% |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 44.5M | 23,820% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.50 | 118% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 44.12 | 88% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | IQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | +1.60% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 83% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 75% Closely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 73% Closely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| AVGO - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | +9.41% | ||
More | ||||
IQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that IQM and AAPL have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IQM and AAPL's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQM | 100% | +1.69% | ||
| AAPL - IQM | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| FSLR - IQM | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.62% | ||
| ENR - IQM | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
| IDXX - IQM | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
| FTI - IQM | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
More | ||||