Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs IQM
CIBR vs IQM Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs IQM
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$72.42
Change-$0.20 (-0.28%)
Volume$1.09M
Net Assets10.95B
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
Price$94.05
Change-$1.35 (-1.42%)
Volume$8.53K
Net Assets75.27M
CIBR vs IQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. IQM commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and IQM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11B vs. IQM (75.3M). IQM has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: IQM (7.590) vs CIBR (1.358). CIBR was incepted earlier than IQM: CIBR (11 years) vs IQM (6 years). IQM (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). IQM has a higher turnover CIBR (21.00) vs CIBR (21.00).
| CIBR | IQM | CIBR / IQM | |
| Gain YTD | 1.358 | 7.590 | 18% |
| Net Assets | 11B | 75.3M | 14,608% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.50 | 118% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 44.12 | 48% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | IQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 72% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||
IQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IQM has been closely correlated with GEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IQM jumps, then GEV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y