Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs HACK
CIBR vs HACK Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs HACK
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$75.80
Change+$0.41 (+0.54%)
Volume$720
Net Assets11B
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
Price$86.87
Change+$0.60 (+0.70%)
Volume$940
Net Assets2.31B
CIBR vs HACK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. HACK commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and HACK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11B vs. HACK (2.32B). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than HACK: CIBR (18.969) vs HACK (15.814). CIBR was incepted earlier than HACK: CIBR (10 years) vs HACK (11 years). CIBR (0.59) and HACK (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . HACK has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | HACK | CIBR / HACK | |
| Gain YTD | 18.969 | 15.814 | 120% |
| Net Assets | 11B | 2.32B | 475% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.60 | 98% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 71.00 | 55% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 0.09 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| FTNT - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||
HACK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HACK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACK | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| ZS - HACK | 83% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| PANW - HACK | 80% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| CRWD - HACK | 79% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| NET - HACK | 74% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| FTNT - HACK | 69% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||