Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs HACK
CIBR vs HACK Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs HACK
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$74.66
Change+$0.28 (+0.38%)
Volume$787.93K
Net Assets10.09B
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
Price$86.44
Change+$0.56 (+0.65%)
Volume$78.83K
Net Assets2.37B
CIBR vs HACK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. HACK commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Buy and HACK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 10.1B vs. HACK (2.37B). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than HACK: CIBR (17.817) vs HACK (15.975). CIBR was incepted earlier than HACK: CIBR (10 years) vs HACK (11 years). CIBR (0.59) and HACK (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . HACK has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | HACK | CIBR / HACK | |
| Gain YTD | 17.817 | 15.975 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 2.37B | 427% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.60 | 98% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 71.00 | 55% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 0.09 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 12 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFVE | 30.64 | 0.14 | +0.47% |
| DoubleLine Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF | |||
| NUMV | 37.58 | 0.14 | +0.37% |
| Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | |||
| OAKM | 26.34 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF | |||
| INTF | 34.88 | -0.03 | -0.09% |
| iShares International Equity Factor ETF | |||
| EMXF | 43.63 | -0.14 | -0.32% |
| iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | |||
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 77% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 75% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 72% Closely correlated | +3.57% | ||
| S - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
More | ||||
HACK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HACK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACK | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| ZS - HACK | 75% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| CRWD - HACK | 74% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| NET - HACK | 73% Closely correlated | +3.57% | ||
| S - HACK | 67% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| RBRK - HACK | 67% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||