Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs HACK
CIBR vs HACK Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs HACK
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$75.93
Change+$1.41 (+1.89%)
Volume$892.14K
Net Assets10.15B
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
Price$86.71
Change+$1.61 (+1.89%)
Volume$93.72K
Net Assets2.38B
CIBR vs HACK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. HACK commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and HACK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 10.1B vs. HACK (2.38B). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than HACK: CIBR (19.822) vs HACK (16.405). CIBR was incepted earlier than HACK: CIBR (10 years) vs HACK (11 years). CIBR (0.59) and HACK (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . HACK has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | HACK | CIBR / HACK | |
| Gain YTD | 19.822 | 16.405 | 121% |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 2.38B | 425% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.60 | 98% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 50.00 | 78% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 0.09 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 82% | 17 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | +1.89% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 76% Closely correlated | +3.63% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 75% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 73% Closely correlated | +2.79% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 72% Closely correlated | +3.42% | ||
| S - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
More | ||||
HACK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HACK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACK | 100% | +1.89% | ||
| ZS - HACK | 75% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| NET - HACK | 74% Closely correlated | +3.42% | ||
| CRWD - HACK | 72% Closely correlated | +3.63% | ||
| S - HACK | 67% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| RBRK - HACK | 66% Closely correlated | +4.09% | ||
More | ||||