Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs GAST
CIBR vs GAST Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs GAST
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$74.76
Change-$1.30 (-1.71%)
Volume$942.89K
Net Assets11.36B
CIBR vs GAST Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. GAST commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Buy and GAST is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11.4B vs. GAST (6.84M). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than GAST: CIBR (20.027) vs GAST (18.807). CIBR was incepted earlier than GAST: CIBR (10 years) vs GAST (4 years). GAST (0.00) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). CIBR has a higher turnover GAST (1.00) vs GAST (1.00).
| CIBR | GAST | CIBR / GAST | |
| Gain YTD | 20.027 | 18.807 | 106% |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 6.84M | 166,789% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 1.00 | 3,900% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.61 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | GAST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -1.04% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 71% Closely correlated | -3.95% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | -3.41% | ||
More | ||||
GAST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GAST has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GAST jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GAST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAST | 100% | N/A | ||
| ITT - GAST | 71% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| IR - GAST | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| MWA - GAST | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| KE - GAST | 58% Loosely correlated | +5.52% | ||
| GWW - GAST | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
More | ||||