Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs FXL
CIBR vs FXL Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs FXL
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$70.45
Change-$1.07 (-1.50%)
Volume$400
Net Assets9.12B
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$145.21
Change-$2.29 (-1.55%)
Volume$355
Net Assets1.28B
CIBR vs FXL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. FXL commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Buy and FXL is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 9.12B vs. FXL (1.28B). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than FXL: CIBR (12.726) vs FXL (-0.707). CIBR was incepted earlier than FXL: CIBR (10 years) vs FXL (18 years). CIBR (0.59) and FXL (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . FXL has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | FXL | CIBR / FXL | |
| Gain YTD | 12.726 | -0.707 | -1,800% |
| Net Assets | 9.12B | 1.28B | 710% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.60 | 98% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 119.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 0.24 | 0.04 | 647% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | FXL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | +1.22% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 72% Closely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 71% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | +5.58% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| S - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | +2.01% | ||
More | ||||
FXL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FXL has been closely correlated with ENTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FXL jumps, then ENTG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FXL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FXL | 100% | N/A | ||
| ENTG - FXL | 82% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| LRCX - FXL | 80% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| AMKR - FXL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| MPWR - FXL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| MCHP - FXL | 75% Closely correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||