Ad is loading...
CIBR vs FXL
CIBR vs FXL Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs FXL
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$61.77
Change-$0.46 (-0.74%)
Volume$645.63K
Net Assets7.59B
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$125.02
Change+$0.10 (+0.08%)
Volume$16.44K
Net Assets1.11B
CIBR vs FXL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. FXL commentary
Apr 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Buy and FXL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 7.59B vs. FXL (1.11B). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than FXL: CIBR (-2.641) vs FXL (-15.842). CIBR was incepted earlier than FXL: CIBR (10 years) vs FXL (18 years). CIBR (0.59) and FXL (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . FXL has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | FXL | CIBR / FXL | |
| Gain YTD | -2.641 | -15.842 | 17% |
| Net Assets | 7.59B | 1.11B | 685% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.60 | 98% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 119.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 0.26 | 0.04 | 661% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | FXL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 16 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -0.74% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| S - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 68% Closely correlated | -4.37% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 67% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
More | ||||
FXL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FXL has been closely correlated with ENTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FXL jumps, then ENTG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FXL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FXL | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| ENTG - FXL | 82% Closely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| LRCX - FXL | 79% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| AMKR - FXL | 76% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| MPWR - FXL | 76% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| MCHP - FXL | 76% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
More | ||||