Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs FXL
CIBR vs FXL Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs FXL
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$74.76
Change-$1.30 (-1.71%)
Volume$942.89K
Net Assets11.36B
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$164.83
Change-$4.70 (-2.77%)
Volume$13.23K
Net Assets1.43B
CIBR vs FXL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. FXL commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Buy and FXL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11.4B vs. FXL (1.44B). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than FXL: CIBR (20.027) vs FXL (14.130). CIBR was incepted earlier than FXL: CIBR (10 years) vs FXL (19 years). CIBR (0.59) and FXL (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . FXL has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | FXL | CIBR / FXL | |
| Gain YTD | 20.027 | 14.130 | 142% |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 1.44B | 794% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.60 | 98% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 119.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.02 | 930% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | FXL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -1.04% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 71% Closely correlated | -3.95% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | -3.41% | ||
More | ||||
FXL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FXL has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FXL jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FXL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FXL | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| KLAC - FXL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| LRCX - FXL | 77% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| ENTG - FXL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| AMKR - FXL | 75% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| ADI - FXL | 75% Closely correlated | +3.44% | ||
More | ||||