Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs FNGS
CIBR vs FNGS Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs FNGS
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$75.12
Change+$0.30 (+0.40%)
Volume$780.59K
Net Assets11.1B
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ ETN
Price$69.39
Change+$0.38 (+0.55%)
Volume$57.86K
Net Assets518.55M
CIBR vs FNGS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. FNGS commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and FNGS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11.1B vs. FNGS (519M). FNGS has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: FNGS (20.973) vs CIBR (18.543). CIBR was incepted earlier than FNGS: CIBR (10 years) vs FNGS (6 years). FNGS (0.58) and CIBR (0.59) have comparable expense ratios .
| CIBR | FNGS | CIBR / FNGS | |
| Gain YTD | 18.543 | 20.973 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 519M | 2,139% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.58 | 102% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | N/A | - |
| Yield | 0.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | FNGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 18 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 83% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
More | ||||
FNGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNGS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNGS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNGS | 100% | +0.55% | ||
| AMZN - FNGS | 81% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| NVDA - FNGS | 79% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| META - FNGS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| MSFT - FNGS | 72% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| GOOGL - FNGS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||