Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs DAT
CIBR vs DAT Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs DAT
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$66.06
Change-$1.03 (-1.54%)
Volume$1.86K
Net Assets10.31B
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
Price$36.26
Change-$12.43 (-25.53%)
Volume$200
Net Assets5.85M
CIBR vs DAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. DAT commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and DAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 10.3B vs. DAT (5.85M). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than DAT: CIBR (-6.102) vs DAT (-14.758). CIBR was incepted earlier than DAT: CIBR (11 years) vs DAT (4 years). DAT (0.58) and CIBR (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . DAT has a higher turnover CIBR (21.00) vs CIBR (21.00).
| CIBR | DAT | CIBR / DAT | |
| Gain YTD | -6.102 | -14.758 | 41% |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 5.85M | 176,038% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.58 | 102% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 35.00 | 60% |
| Yield | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | DAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -3.59% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 83% Closely correlated | -3.90% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -5.23% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -6.26% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 73% Closely correlated | -6.64% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | -4.82% | ||
More | ||||
DAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAT has been closely correlated with RBRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DAT jumps, then RBRK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAT | 100% | N/A | ||
| RBRK - DAT | 67% Closely correlated | -4.22% | ||
| BRZE - DAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -8.73% | ||
| INFA - DAT | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TYL - DAT | 7% Poorly correlated | -8.50% | ||
| CFLT - DAT | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
More | ||||