Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs DAT
CIBR vs DAT Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs DAT
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$72.77
Change+$0.35 (+0.48%)
Volume$100
Net Assets10.95B
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
Price$43.80
Change-$0.85 (-1.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.59M
CIBR vs DAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. DAT commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and DAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11B vs. DAT (6.59M). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than DAT: CIBR (1.358) vs DAT (-2.359). CIBR was incepted earlier than DAT: CIBR (11 years) vs DAT (4 years). DAT (0.58) and CIBR (0.59) have comparable expense ratios . DAT has a higher turnover CIBR (21.00) vs CIBR (21.00).
| CIBR | DAT | CIBR / DAT | |
| Gain YTD | 1.358 | -2.359 | -58% |
| Net Assets | 11B | 6.59M | 166,818% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.58 | 102% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 35.00 | 60% |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | DAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 25 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 72% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||
DAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAT has been closely correlated with RBRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DAT jumps, then RBRK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAT | 100% | N/A | ||
| RBRK - DAT | 69% Closely correlated | -3.78% | ||
| WEAV - DAT | 66% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
| BRZE - DAT | 59% Loosely correlated | -6.52% | ||
| INFA - DAT | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TYL - DAT | 7% Poorly correlated | +2.00% | ||
More | ||||