CIBN
Price
$20.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
14.45M
HLFN
Price
$33.44
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
47.04M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIBN vs HLFN

Header iconCIBN vs HLFN Comparison
Open Charts CIBN vs HLFNBanner chart's image
Community Investors Ban
Price$20.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization14.45M
Home Loan Financial
Price$33.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization47.04M
CIBN vs HLFN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIBN vs. HLFN commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBN is a Hold and HLFN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CIBN: $20.00 vs. HLFN: $33.44)
Brand notoriety: CIBN and HLFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIBN: 77% vs. HLFN: 12%
Market capitalization -- CIBN: $14.45M vs. HLFN: $47.04M
CIBN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.45M. HLFN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $47.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIBN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLFN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIBN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIBN is a better buy in the long-term than HLFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIBN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLFN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIBN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HLFN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CIBN and HLFN are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CIBN (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HLFN (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLFN($47M) has a higher market cap than CIBN($14.5M). CIBN has higher P/E ratio than HLFN: CIBN (8.73) vs HLFN (6.52). CIBN YTD gains are higher at: 14.906 vs. HLFN (9.744). CIBN has more cash in the bank: 4.65M vs. HLFN (3.96M). HLFN has less debt than CIBN: HLFN (29.6M) vs CIBN (45.4M).
CIBNHLFNCIBN / HLFN
Capitalization14.5M47M31%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.9069.744153%
P/E Ratio8.736.52134%
Revenue12.7MN/A-
Total Cash4.65M3.96M117%
Total Debt45.4M29.6M153%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIBN vs HLFN: Fundamental Ratings
CIBN
HLFN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3914
SMR RATING
1..100
7451
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9271
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIBN's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as HLFN (58). This means that CIBN’s stock grew similarly to HLFN’s over the last 12 months.

HLFN's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as CIBN (39). This means that HLFN’s stock grew similarly to CIBN’s over the last 12 months.

HLFN's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CIBN (74). This means that HLFN’s stock grew similarly to CIBN’s over the last 12 months.

CIBN's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as HLFN (51). This means that CIBN’s stock grew similarly to HLFN’s over the last 12 months.

HLFN's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as CIBN (92). This means that HLFN’s stock grew similarly to CIBN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIBNHLFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKUFF25.001.16
+4.87%
Svenska Kullagerfabriken AB
DACHF8.43N/A
N/A
Daicel Chemical Industries Ltd.
ONWRF4.60N/A
N/A
Onward Med NV
HNFSA45.00N/A
N/A
Hanover Foods Corp.
STCB0.03N/A
-10.77%
Starco Brands, Inc.

CIBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIBN and WFCL have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIBN and WFCL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIBN
1D Price
Change %
CIBN100%
N/A
WFCL - CIBN
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLFN - CIBN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OTTW - CIBN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBH - CIBN
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
CHBJF - CIBN
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HLFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLFN and CIBN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLFN and CIBN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLFN
1D Price
Change %
HLFN100%
N/A
CIBN - HLFN
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWG - HLFN
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
KEY - HLFN
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
JPHLF - HLFN
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HVLM - HLFN
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More