CIBH
Price
$35.10
Change
-$0.38 (-1.07%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
47.41M
CMBNF
Price
$91.31
Change
+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.32B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIBH vs CMBNF

Header iconCIBH vs CMBNF Comparison
Open Charts CIBH vs CMBNFBanner chart's image
CIB Marine Bancshares
Price$35.10
Change-$0.38 (-1.07%)
Volume$10.6K
Capitalization47.41M
CEMBRA MONEY BK AG
Price$91.31
Change+$25.31 (+38.35%)
Volume$170
Capitalization3.32B
CIBH vs CMBNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIBH vs. CMBNF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBH is a Hold and CMBNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CIBH: $35.10 vs. CMBNF: $91.31)
Brand notoriety: CIBH and CMBNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIBH: 623% vs. CMBNF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CIBH: $47.41M vs. CMBNF: $3.32B
CIBH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.41M. CMBNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIBH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMBNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMBNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CIBH and CMBNF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIBH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CIBH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CIBH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.31% price change this week, while CMBNF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBNF($3.32B) has a higher market cap than CIBH($47.4M). CIBH (15.53) and CMBNF (14.94) have similar P/E ratio . CIBH YTD gains are higher at: 30.580 vs. CMBNF (0.000). CIBH has less debt than CMBNF: CIBH (23.8M) vs CMBNF (2.76B). CMBNF has higher revenues than CIBH: CMBNF (550M) vs CIBH (34.1M).
CIBHCMBNFCIBH / CMBNF
Capitalization47.4M3.32B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.5800.000-
P/E Ratio15.5314.94104%
Revenue34.1M550M6%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt23.8M2.76B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIBH: Fundamental Ratings
CIBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53
SMR RATING
1..100
79
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIBHCMBNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPISX13.640.05
+0.37%
Nuveen Quant Intl Small Cap Eq Premier
RGAGX85.36-0.06
-0.07%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
MCSPX11.21-0.02
-0.18%
BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap Inv C
PARWX57.32-0.17
-0.30%
Parnassus Value Equity Investor
MRLTX19.19-0.09
-0.47%
AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth N

CIBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIBH and ANDC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIBH and ANDC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIBH
1D Price
Change %
CIBH100%
-1.06%
ANDC - CIBH
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBS - CIBH
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
NACB - CIBH
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
CMBNF - CIBH
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TVLF - CIBH
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.94%
More

CMBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMBNF has been loosely correlated with BLMIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMBNF jumps, then BLMIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMBNF
1D Price
Change %
CMBNF100%
N/A
BLMIF - CMBNF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BWAGF - CMBNF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BORT - CMBNF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCXS - CMBNF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAP - CMBNF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More