CIBEY
Price
$1.92
Change
+$0.03 (+1.59%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.92B
HSNGF
Price
$15.35
Change
+$1.08 (+7.57%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
27.43B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIBEY vs HSNGF

Header iconCIBEY vs HSNGF Comparison
Open Charts CIBEY vs HSNGFBanner chart's image
Commercial International Bank
Price$1.92
Change+$0.03 (+1.59%)
Volume$6.57K
Capitalization5.92B
Hang Seng Bank
Price$15.35
Change+$1.08 (+7.57%)
Volume$100
Capitalization27.43B
CIBEY vs HSNGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIBEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HSNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIBEY vs. HSNGF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBEY is a Hold and HSNGF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CIBEY: $1.92 vs. HSNGF: $15.35)
Brand notoriety: CIBEY and HSNGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIBEY: 54% vs. HSNGF: 4%
Market capitalization -- CIBEY: $5.92B vs. HSNGF: $27.43B
CIBEY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.92B. HSNGF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $27.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIBEY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHSNGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CIBEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HSNGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HSNGF is a better buy in the long-term than CIBEY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIBEY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HSNGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIBEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HSNGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CIBEY and HSNGF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CIBEY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.13% price change this week, while HSNGF (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSNGF($27.4B) has a higher market cap than CIBEY($5.92B). HSNGF has higher P/E ratio than CIBEY: HSNGF (15.69) vs CIBEY (5.16). CIBEY YTD gains are higher at: 40.254 vs. HSNGF (26.026). CIBEY (36.2B) and HSNGF (38B) have identical debt. CIBEY has higher revenues than HSNGF: CIBEY (99B) vs HSNGF (41.6B).
CIBEYHSNGFCIBEY / HSNGF
Capitalization5.92B27.4B22%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD40.25426.026155%
P/E Ratio5.1615.6933%
Revenue99B41.6B238%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt36.2B38B95%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIBEY vs HSNGF: Fundamental Ratings
CIBEY
HSNGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86100
SMR RATING
1..100
13
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7514
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HSNGF's Valuation (88) in the null industry is in the same range as CIBEY (97). This means that HSNGF’s stock grew similarly to CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

CIBEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as HSNGF (100). This means that CIBEY’s stock grew similarly to HSNGF’s over the last 12 months.

CIBEY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as HSNGF (3). This means that CIBEY’s stock grew similarly to HSNGF’s over the last 12 months.

CIBEY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as HSNGF (47). This means that CIBEY’s stock grew similarly to HSNGF’s over the last 12 months.

HSNGF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIBEY (75). This means that HSNGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIBEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIBEYHSNGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIBEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HSNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NZF12.190.24
+2.01%
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
EPHE26.060.28
+1.09%
iShares MSCI Philippines ETF
DIAL18.360.09
+0.49%
Columbia Diversified Fixed Inc Allc ETF
PCHI25.440.06
+0.26%
Polen High Income ETF
PST22.07-0.22
-0.97%
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury

CIBEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIBEY and BNKHF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIBEY and BNKHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIBEY
1D Price
Change %
CIBEY100%
+1.59%
BNKHF - CIBEY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MZHOF - CIBEY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSNGF - CIBEY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - CIBEY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGMBF - CIBEY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HSNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HSNGF and MTPOF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HSNGF and MTPOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HSNGF
1D Price
Change %
HSNGF100%
N/A
MTPOF - HSNGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
MZHOF - HSNGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JDVB - HSNGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - HSNGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
IBTN - HSNGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
More