Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FGGBX
CIBCX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FGGBX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
Price$81.13
Change+$0.40 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.93B
Templeton Global Dynamic Income R6
Price$2.88
Change+$0.02 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets314.86M
CIBCX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FGGBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Hold and FGGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 121B vs. FGGBX (315M). FGGBX pays higher dividends than CIBCX: FGGBX (4.20) vs CIBCX (2.15). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIBCX (25 years) vs FGGBX (13 years). CIBCX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FGGBX (0.96). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIBCX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.35 vs. CIBCX (12.82). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.98 vs. FGGBX (23.63).
| CIBCX | FGGBX | CIBCX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.89 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.96 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.215 | 23.787 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 121B | 315M | 38,413% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 4.20 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.82 | 19.35 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.46 | 41.06 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.98 | 23.63 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.95 | 30.10 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement