Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FCGBX
CIBCX vs FCGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FCGBX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
Price$77.55
Change+$0.06 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.93B
Templeton Global Dynamic Income C
Price$2.92
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.05M
CIBCX vs FCGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FCGBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Hold and FCGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 121B vs. FCGBX (318M). FCGBX pays higher dividends than CIBCX: FCGBX (3.16) vs CIBCX (2.15). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FCGBX: CIBCX (25 years) vs FCGBX (15 years). FCGBX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.34). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FCGBX (43.31). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGBX: CIBCX (250) vs FCGBX (1000). FCGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.71 vs. CIBCX (12.50). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.54 vs. FCGBX (19.60).
| CIBCX | FCGBX | CIBCX / FCGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.96 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 2.01 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.460 | 26.236 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 121B | 318M | 38,050% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 3.16 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.50 | 25.71 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.62 | 42.68 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.54 | 19.60 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.31 | 28.05 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers