CIB
Price
$42.79
Change
-$0.65 (-1.50%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
8.27B
72 days until earnings call
WF
Price
$35.23
Change
-$0.52 (-1.45%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
7.73B
52 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CIB vs WF

Header iconCIB vs WF Comparison
Open Charts CIB vs WFBanner chart's image
Bancolombia SA
Price$42.79
Change-$0.65 (-1.50%)
Volume$451.06K
Capitalization8.27B
Woori Financial Group
Price$35.23
Change-$0.52 (-1.45%)
Volume$72.37K
Capitalization7.73B
CIB vs WF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIB vs. WF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIB is a Hold and WF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CIB: $42.79 vs. WF: $35.23)
Brand notoriety: CIB and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIB: 119% vs. WF: 120%
Market capitalization -- CIB: $8.27B vs. WF: $7.73B
CIB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.27B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $7.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIB’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • CIB’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIB is a better buy in the long-term than WF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIB is a better buy in the short-term than WF.

Price Growth

CIB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.11% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIB is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

WF is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.87% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIB($8.27B) has a higher market cap than WF($7.73B). CIB has higher P/E ratio than WF: CIB (5.22) vs WF (3.62). CIB YTD gains are higher at: 35.798 vs. WF (12.736). CIB has higher revenues than WF: CIB (28.51T) vs WF (11.84T).
CIBWFCIB / WF
Capitalization8.27B7.73B107%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD35.79812.736281%
P/E Ratio5.223.62144%
Revenue28.51T11.84T241%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt32.09TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIB vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
CIB
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2517
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1626
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WF's Valuation (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CIB (19) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to CIB’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CIB (1) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to CIB’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CIB (1) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to CIB’s over the last 12 months.

CIB's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WF (51) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CIB’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

CIB's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WF (26) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CIB’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIBWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

CIB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIB has been loosely correlated with AVAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIB jumps, then AVAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIB
1D Price
Change %
CIB100%
-1.50%
AVAL - CIB
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
TCBI - CIB
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
CFB - CIB
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.77%
BSBR - CIB
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
WF - CIB
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
More

WF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WF
1D Price
Change %
WF100%
-1.45%
SHG - WF
74%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
KB - WF
68%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
SSB - WF
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
FHB - WF
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.90%
EBC - WF
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.01%
More