CIB
Price
$49.53
Change
+$0.97 (+2.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
12.96B
NWG
Price
$14.83
Change
-$0.34 (-2.24%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
60.66B
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIB vs NWG

Header iconCIB vs NWG Comparison
Open Charts CIB vs NWGBanner chart's image
Grupo Cibest SA
Price$49.53
Change+$0.97 (+2.00%)
Volume$425.17K
Capitalization12.96B
NatWest Group
Price$14.83
Change-$0.34 (-2.24%)
Volume$3.72M
Capitalization60.66B
CIB vs NWG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIB vs. NWG commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIB is a Hold and NWG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CIB: $49.53 vs. NWG: $14.83)
Brand notoriety: CIB and NWG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIB: 147% vs. NWG: 91%
Market capitalization -- CIB: $12.96B vs. NWG: $60.66B
CIB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.96B. NWG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $60.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIB’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileNWG’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • CIB’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • NWG’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CIB and NWG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NWG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWG is a better buy in the short-term than CIB.

Price Growth

CIB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.27% price change this week, while NWG (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

NWG is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWG($60.7B) has a higher market cap than CIB($13B). NWG has higher P/E ratio than CIB: NWG (9.30) vs CIB (7.21). CIB YTD gains are higher at: 74.545 vs. NWG (53.629).
CIBNWGCIB / NWG
Capitalization13B60.7B21%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD74.54553.629139%
P/E Ratio7.219.3078%
Revenue27.99TN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt24.64TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIB vs NWG: Fundamental Ratings
CIB
NWG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2522
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2426
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
43n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIB's Valuation (7) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (32) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CIB’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

CIB's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (3) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CIB’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

CIB's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (5) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CIB’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CIB (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to CIB’s over the last 12 months.

CIB's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (26) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CIB’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIBNWG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NFLP38.600.20
+0.52%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Netflix ETF
IBTF23.330.01
+0.04%
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Tr ETF
PMIO49.950.01
+0.01%
PGIM Municipal Income Opportunities ETF
SIZE157.07-0.61
-0.39%
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF
RGT12.42-0.08
-0.60%
Royce Global Value Trust

CIB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIB has been loosely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIB jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIB
1D Price
Change %
CIB100%
+2.00%
BSAC - CIB
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
BCH - CIB
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
AVAL - CIB
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
LYG - CIB
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
NWG - CIB
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
More

NWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWG has been closely correlated with LYG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWG jumps, then LYG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWG
1D Price
Change %
NWG100%
-2.24%
LYG - NWG
72%
Closely correlated
-1.31%
DB - NWG
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
MFG - NWG
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
BANC - NWG
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
BLX - NWG
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
More