Advertisement
CIB vs EMDV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIB is a Hold and EMDV is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CIB’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CIB’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CIB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CIB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CIB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.49% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
CIB | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CIB | EMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 58% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BJUL | 49.51 | 0.25 | +0.51% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF July | |||
| CGNG | 31.21 | 0.06 | +0.19% |
| Capital Group New Geography Equity ETF | |||
| TBF | 23.23 | 0.04 | +0.17% |
| ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury | |||
| VTC | 78.82 | -0.03 | -0.04% |
| Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| ION | 40.23 | -0.47 | -1.16% |
| ProShares S&P Global Cor Btty Mtls ETF | |||
CIB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIB has been loosely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIB jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIB | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| BSAC - CIB | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| BCH - CIB | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| AVAL - CIB | 41% Loosely correlated | +3.78% | ||
| INTR - CIB | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| DB - CIB | 40% Loosely correlated | -4.30% | ||
More | ||||
EMDV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMDV and ACGP have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMDV and ACGP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMDV | 100% | +1.78% | ||
| ACGP - EMDV | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
| TEL - EMDV | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| CIB - EMDV | -1% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
| SLM - EMDV | -7% Poorly correlated | +1.98% | ||
| INFY - EMDV | -9% Poorly correlated | +1.62% |