CIADY
Price
$18.21
Change
-$0.35 (-1.89%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.16B
WHGLY
Price
$21.55
Change
-$0.11 (-0.51%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
13.86B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIADY vs WHGLY

Header iconCIADY vs WHGLY Comparison
Open Charts CIADY vs WHGLYBanner chart's image
China Mengniu Dairy
Price$18.21
Change-$0.35 (-1.89%)
Volume$13.27K
Capitalization7.16B
WH Group
Price$21.55
Change-$0.11 (-0.51%)
Volume$29.44K
Capitalization13.86B
CIADY vs WHGLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIADY vs. WHGLY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIADY is a Hold and WHGLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CIADY: $18.56 vs. WHGLY: $21.66)
Brand notoriety: CIADY and WHGLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIADY: 78% vs. WHGLY: 113%
Market capitalization -- CIADY: $7.16B vs. WHGLY: $13.86B
CIADY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $7.16B. WHGLY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $13.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $229.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIADY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CIADY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WHGLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIADY is a better buy in the long-term than WHGLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIADY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHGLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIADY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WHGLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WHGLY is a better buy in the short-term than CIADY.

Price Growth

CIADY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -4.33% price change this week, while WHGLY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -1.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +186.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.41% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHGLY($13.9B) has a higher market cap than CIADY($7.16B). CIADY has higher P/E ratio than WHGLY: CIADY (509.41) vs WHGLY (8.56). WHGLY YTD gains are higher at: 57.298 vs. CIADY (-13.795).
CIADYWHGLYCIADY / WHGLY
Capitalization7.16B13.9B52%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.79557.298-24%
P/E Ratio509.418.565,952%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A2.06B-
Total DebtN/A3.72B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIADY vs WHGLY: Fundamental Ratings
CIADY
WHGLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6676
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10032
SMR RATING
1..100
2192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
169
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5031

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WHGLY's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIADY (39). This means that WHGLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

WHGLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIADY (100). This means that WHGLY’s stock grew significantly faster than CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADY's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WHGLY (92). This means that CIADY’s stock grew significantly faster than WHGLY’s over the last 12 months.

WHGLY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADY (64). This means that WHGLY’s stock grew similarly to CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WHGLY (69). This means that CIADY’s stock grew significantly faster than WHGLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIADYWHGLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CDE18.220.80
+4.59%
Coeur Mining
RSI21.600.02
+0.09%
Rush Street Interactive
MLR38.81-0.17
-0.45%
Miller Industries
XHG1.53-0.03
-1.92%
Xchange TEC Inc
DGLY2.13-0.09
-4.27%
Digital Ally Inc New

CIADY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIADY and TYCMY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIADY and TYCMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIADY
1D Price
Change %
CIADY100%
N/A
TYCMY - CIADY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGLY - CIADY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DANOY - CIADY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFF - CIADY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - CIADY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WHGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGLY and CIADY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGLY and CIADY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGLY
1D Price
Change %
WHGLY100%
N/A
CIADY - WHGLY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UVRBF - WHGLY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TATYY - WHGLY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOFB - WHGLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VTSYF - WHGLY
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More