CIADY
Price
$19.20
Change
+$0.15 (+0.79%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
7.51B
FPAFY
Price
$4.35
Change
+$0.05 (+1.16%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
3.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIADY vs FPAFY

Header iconCIADY vs FPAFY Comparison
Open Charts CIADY vs FPAFYBanner chart's image
China Mengniu Dairy
Price$19.20
Change+$0.15 (+0.79%)
Volume$2.48K
Capitalization7.51B
First Pacific
Price$4.35
Change+$0.05 (+1.16%)
Volume$14.12K
Capitalization3.6B
CIADY vs FPAFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPAFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIADY vs. FPAFY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIADY is a Hold and FPAFY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CIADY: $19.20 vs. FPAFY: $4.35)
Brand notoriety: CIADY and FPAFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIADY: 70% vs. FPAFY: 45%
Market capitalization -- CIADY: $7.51B vs. FPAFY: $3.6B
CIADY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $7.51B. FPAFY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $3.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIADY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFPAFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CIADY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FPAFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPAFY is a better buy in the long-term than CIADY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIADY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPAFY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIADY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FPAFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FPAFY is a better buy in the short-term than CIADY.

Price Growth

CIADY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -5.97% price change this week, while FPAFY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +2.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.61% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIADY($7.51B) has a higher market cap than FPAFY($3.6B). CIADY has higher P/E ratio than FPAFY: CIADY (509.41) vs FPAFY (5.11). FPAFY YTD gains are higher at: 61.205 vs. CIADY (-10.823).
CIADYFPAFYCIADY / FPAFY
Capitalization7.51B3.6B209%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.82361.205-18%
P/E Ratio509.415.119,963%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A2.86B-
Total DebtN/A12.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIADY vs FPAFY: Fundamental Ratings
CIADY
FPAFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6119
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1002
SMR RATING
1..100
2197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
149
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FPAFY's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADY (38). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew similarly to CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIADY (100). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew significantly faster than CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADY's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FPAFY (97). This means that CIADY’s stock grew significantly faster than FPAFY’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADY (63). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew similarly to CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPAFY (49). This means that CIADY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPAFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIADYFPAFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPAFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEFA35.290.30
+0.85%
Global X S&P Cthlc Vls Dvlpd ex-US ETF
IOCT33.430.22
+0.68%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF™ - Oct
JMST50.950.01
+0.03%
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Inc ETF
IBHE23.16N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds 2025 Term HY and Inc ETF
BMAX27.51-0.42
-1.49%
Rex Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF

CIADY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIADY and TYCMY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIADY and TYCMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIADY
1D Price
Change %
CIADY100%
+0.79%
TYCMY - CIADY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
WHGLY - CIADY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
DANOY - CIADY
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
FPAFF - CIADY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - CIADY
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
More

FPAFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPAFY and GLAPF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPAFY and GLAPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPAFY
1D Price
Change %
FPAFY100%
+1.16%
GLAPF - FPAFY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPAGF - FPAFY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVNZF - FPAFY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFF - FPAFY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLBEY - FPAFY
5%
Poorly correlated
+6.28%
More