CIADY
Price
$20.61
Change
-$0.37 (-1.76%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
14.88B
FPAFF
Price
$0.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIADY vs FPAFF

Header iconCIADY vs FPAFF Comparison
Open Charts CIADY vs FPAFFBanner chart's image
China Mengniu Dairy
Price$20.61
Change-$0.37 (-1.76%)
Volume$2.75K
Capitalization14.88B
First Pacific
Price$0.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization1.53B
CIADY vs FPAFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIADY vs. FPAFF commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIADY is a Hold and FPAFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CIADY: $20.61 vs. FPAFF: $0.75)
Brand notoriety: CIADY and FPAFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIADY: 99% vs. FPAFF: 8%
Market capitalization -- CIADY: $14.88B vs. FPAFF: $1.53B
CIADY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $14.88B. FPAFF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIADY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFPAFF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CIADY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FPAFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPAFF is a better buy in the long-term than CIADY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIADY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPAFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIADY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FPAFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CIADY and FPAFF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CIADY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.60% price change this week, while FPAFF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIADY($14.9B) has a higher market cap than FPAFF($1.53B). CIADY has higher P/E ratio than FPAFF: CIADY (19.12) vs FPAFF (3.90). FPAFF YTD gains are higher at: 33.204 vs. CIADY (-4.297). CIADY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.5B vs. FPAFF (2.25B). CIADY has higher revenues than FPAFF: CIADY (92.6B) vs FPAFF (9.95B).
CIADYFPAFFCIADY / FPAFF
Capitalization14.9B1.53B971%
EBITDA10.5B2.25B466%
Gain YTD-4.29733.204-13%
P/E Ratio19.123.90490%
Revenue92.6B9.95B931%
Total CashN/A2.81B-
Total DebtN/A11.2B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIADY vs FPAFF: Fundamental Ratings
CIADY
FPAFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7238
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1009
SMR RATING
1..100
1761
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
117
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FPAFF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADY (46). This means that FPAFF’s stock grew similarly to CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIADY (100). This means that FPAFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADY's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPAFF (61). This means that CIADY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPAFF’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADY (60). This means that FPAFF’s stock grew similarly to CIADY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as FPAFF (17). This means that CIADY’s stock grew similarly to FPAFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIADYFPAFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIADY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXOZ10.390.66
+6.83%
eXoZymes Inc
RL276.353.77
+1.38%
Ralph Lauren Corp
PAX13.72-0.05
-0.36%
Patria Investments Limited
AMSC36.44-0.24
-0.65%
American Superconductor Corp
NITO0.23-0.01
-4.10%
N2OFF

CIADY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIADY and TYCMY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIADY and TYCMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIADY
1D Price
Change %
CIADY100%
-1.78%
TYCMY - CIADY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
CULTF - CIADY
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
WHGLY - CIADY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
DANOY - CIADY
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
FPAFF - CIADY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FPAFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPAFF and BRRLY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPAFF and BRRLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPAFF
1D Price
Change %
FPAFF100%
N/A
BRRLY - FPAFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
CUSI - FPAFF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - FPAFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
CIADY - FPAFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
FNEVY - FPAFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More