CIADF
Price
$1.80
Change
-$0.08 (-4.26%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.16B
PIFFY
Price
$10.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
6.84B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIADF vs PIFFY

Header iconCIADF vs PIFFY Comparison
Open Charts CIADF vs PIFFYBanner chart's image
China Mengniu Dairy
Price$1.80
Change-$0.08 (-4.26%)
Volume$577
Capitalization7.16B
PT Indofood CBP Sukses Makmur
Price$10.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$230
Capitalization6.84B
CIADF vs PIFFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIFFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIADF vs. PIFFY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIADF is a Hold and PIFFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CIADF: $1.88 vs. PIFFY: $10.00)
Brand notoriety: CIADF and PIFFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIADF: 24% vs. PIFFY: 112%
Market capitalization -- CIADF: $7.16B vs. PIFFY: $6.84B
CIADF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $7.16B. PIFFY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $6.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $229.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIADF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePIFFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CIADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PIFFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIADF is a better buy in the long-term than PIFFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIADF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIFFY’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIADF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PIFFY’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CIADF and PIFFY are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CIADF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -6.25% price change this week, while PIFFY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +186.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.41% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIADF($7.16B) and PIFFY($6.84B) have the same market capitalization . CIADF has higher P/E ratio than PIFFY: CIADF (515.87) vs PIFFY (10.69). CIADF YTD gains are higher at: 26.689 vs. PIFFY (-37.295).
CIADFPIFFYCIADF / PIFFY
Capitalization7.16B6.84B105%
EBITDAN/A16.18T-
Gain YTD26.689-37.295-72%
P/E Ratio515.8710.694,827%
RevenueN/A73.24T-
Total CashN/A29.69T-
Total DebtN/A45.82T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIADF vs PIFFY: Fundamental Ratings
CIADF
PIFFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8896
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5514
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6192
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
188
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a42

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIFFY's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADF (40). This means that PIFFY’s stock grew similarly to CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

PIFFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADF (100). This means that PIFFY’s stock grew similarly to CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

PIFFY's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIADF (55). This means that PIFFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

CIADF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as PIFFY (92). This means that CIADF’s stock grew similarly to PIFFY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PIFFY (88). This means that CIADF’s stock grew significantly faster than PIFFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIADFPIFFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIFFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMF39.770.02
+0.05%
Direxion Daily 20+ Yr Trsy Bull 3X ETF
ISEP31.61-0.09
-0.27%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Sept
SYSB89.54-0.46
-0.51%
iShares Systematic Bond ETF
LTL114.05-0.90
-0.78%
ProShares Ultra Communication Services
DNL39.87-0.60
-1.48%
WisdomTree Global ex-US Qual Div Gr ETF

CIADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIADF has been loosely correlated with PIFFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIADF jumps, then PIFFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIADF
1D Price
Change %
CIADF100%
N/A
PIFFY - CIADF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BOF - CIADF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
AMNC - CIADF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYSFY - CIADF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYCF - CIADF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PIFFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIFFY has been loosely correlated with CIADF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PIFFY jumps, then CIADF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIFFY
1D Price
Change %
PIFFY100%
N/A
CIADF - PIFFY
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JDEPF - PIFFY
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMNC - PIFFY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOF - PIFFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
ACOPF - PIFFY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More