CIADF
Price
$2.18
Change
-$0.32 (-12.80%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
7.51B
PIFFY
Price
$14.50
Change
-$1.79 (-10.99%)
Updated
Jan 7 closing price
Capitalization
6.55B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIADF vs PIFFY

Header iconCIADF vs PIFFY Comparison
Open Charts CIADF vs PIFFYBanner chart's image
China Mengniu Dairy
Price$2.18
Change-$0.32 (-12.80%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization7.51B
PT Indofood CBP Sukses Makmur
Price$14.50
Change-$1.79 (-10.99%)
Volume$200
Capitalization6.55B
CIADF vs PIFFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIFFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIADF vs. PIFFY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIADF is a Hold and PIFFY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CIADF: $2.18 vs. PIFFY: $14.19)
Brand notoriety: CIADF and PIFFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIADF: 460% vs. PIFFY: 100%
Market capitalization -- CIADF: $7.51B vs. PIFFY: $6.55B
CIADF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $7.51B. PIFFY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $6.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $241.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIADF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePIFFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PIFFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CIADF and PIFFY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIADF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIFFY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIADF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PIFFY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIFFY is a better buy in the short-term than CIADF.

Price Growth

CIADF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PIFFY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.61% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIADF($7.51B) has a higher market cap than PIFFY($6.55B). CIADF has higher P/E ratio than PIFFY: CIADF (515.87) vs PIFFY (17.33). CIADF YTD gains are higher at: 47.297 vs. PIFFY (-10.999).
CIADFPIFFYCIADF / PIFFY
Capitalization7.51B6.55B115%
EBITDAN/A16.18T-
Gain YTD47.297-10.999-430%
P/E Ratio515.8717.332,977%
RevenueN/A73.24T-
Total CashN/A29.69T-
Total DebtN/A45.82T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIADF vs PIFFY: Fundamental Ratings
CIADF
PIFFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9343
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
5514
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
159
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIADF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as PIFFY (48). This means that CIADF’s stock grew similarly to PIFFY’s over the last 12 months.

PIFFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADF (100). This means that PIFFY’s stock grew similarly to CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

PIFFY's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIADF (55). This means that PIFFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

CIADF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as PIFFY (55). This means that CIADF’s stock grew similarly to PIFFY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIFFY (59). This means that CIADF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIFFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIADFPIFFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
12%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIFFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIDV78.270.71
+0.91%
AB US High Dividend ETF
TGLR33.960.29
+0.86%
LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF
HPI16.200.11
+0.68%
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund
IBDT25.470.04
+0.16%
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corp ETF
LSVD26.69N/A
N/A
LSV Disciplined Value ETF

CIADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIADF has been loosely correlated with PIFFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIADF jumps, then PIFFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIADF
1D Price
Change %
CIADF100%
N/A
PIFFY - CIADF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BOF - CIADF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
AMNC - CIADF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYSFY - CIADF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYCF - CIADF
24%
Poorly correlated
+14.26%
More

PIFFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIFFY has been loosely correlated with CIADF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PIFFY jumps, then CIADF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIFFY
1D Price
Change %
PIFFY100%
N/A
CIADF - PIFFY
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JDEPF - PIFFY
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMNC - PIFFY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOF - PIFFY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
ACOPF - PIFFY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More